<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18039b3c7">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999-02-17</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>88 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-99-39</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-39</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18039b3c7</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns99039</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-39</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-39</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-99-39</reportNumber>
 <subject>Performance measures</subject>
 <subject>Combat readiness</subject>
 <subject>Defense operations</subject>
 <subject>Interagency relations</subject>
 <subject>Military training</subject>
 <subject>Defense capabilities</subject>
 <identifier>JCS Joint Vision 2010</identifier>
 <identifier>JCS Unified Command Plan</identifier>
 <type>Chapter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
 <law congress="103" isPrivate="false" number="62"></law>
 <law congress="105" isPrivate="false" number="261"></law>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>U.S. Atlantic Command: Challenging Role in the Evolution of Joint Military Capabilities</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on
Department of Defense (DOD) efforts to improve joint operations,
focusing on: (1) the U.S. Atlantic Command&apos;s (USACOM) actions to
establish itself as the joint force trainer, provider, and integrator of
most continental U.S.-based forces; (2) views on the value of the
Command&apos;s contributions to joint military capabilities; and (3) recent
expansion of the Command&apos;s responsibilities and its possible effects on
the command.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) USACOM has advanced joint training by developing a
state-of-the-art joint task force commander training program and
simulation training center; (2) the Command has also progressed in
developing other elements of joint training, though not at the same
level of maturity or intensity; (3) however, USACOM has had to make
substantive changes in its approach to providing and integrating joint
forces; (4) its initial approach was to develop ready force packages
tailored to meet the geographic commands&apos; spectrum of missions; (5) this
was rebuffed by the military services and the geographic commands, which
did not want or value USACOM&apos;s proactive role and by the Chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff (1993-97), who did not see the utility of such
force packages; (6) by late 1995, USACOM reverted to implementing a
force-providing process that provides the Command with a much more
limited role and ability to affect decisions and change; (7) the
Command&apos;s force integrator role was separated from force providing and
also redirected; (8) the establishment of performance goals and measures
would help USACOM assess and report on the results of its efforts to
improve joint military capabilities; (9) Congress anticipated that the
Government Performance and Results Act principles would be
institutionalized at all organizational levels in federal agencies; (10)
the Command&apos;s recently instituted strategic planning system does not
include performance measures that can be used to evaluate its impact on
the military capabilities of U.S. forces; (11) the Office of the
Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, and USACOM believed the Command
was providing an important focus to the advancement of joint operations;
(12) the views of the geographic commands were generally more reserved,
with some benefitting more than others from USACOM&apos;s efforts; (13) the
Command&apos;s new authorities are likely to increase its role and
capabilities to provide training and joint war fighting support and
enhance its ability to influence decisions within the department; and
(14) although USACOM&apos;s roles are expanding and the number of functions
and DOD organizational elements the Command has relationships with is
significant, its roles and responsibilities are still largely not
spelled out in key DOD policy and guidance, including joint doctrine,
guidance, and other publications.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-39/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-39.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-39/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-39.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-99-39</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-39</url>
</location>
<note>Chapter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-99-39; U.S. Atlantic Command: Challenging Role in the Evolution of Joint Military Capabilities;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Performance measures</topic>
 <topic>Combat readiness</topic>
 <topic>Defense operations</topic>
 <topic>Interagency relations</topic>
 <topic>Military training</topic>
 <topic>Defense capabilities</topic>
 <topic>JCS Joint Vision 2010</topic>
 <topic>JCS Unified Command Plan</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 62 (103rd Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 103-62</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 261 (105th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 105-261</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>