<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180396cd4">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999-01-13</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>22 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-99-26</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-26</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180396cd4</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns99026</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-26</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-26</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-99-26</reportNumber>
 <subject>Army procurement</subject>
 <subject>Department of Defense contractors</subject>
 <subject>Military land vehicles</subject>
 <subject>Concurrency</subject>
 <subject>Schedule slippages</subject>
 <subject>Contract modifications</subject>
 <subject>Quality control</subject>
 <subject>Product evaluation</subject>
 <subject>Contract oversight</subject>
 <identifier>Family of Medium Tactical Vehicles</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Army Medium Trucks: Information on Delivery Delays and Corrosion Problems</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Army&apos;s Family of
Medium Tactical Vehicles (FMTV) program, focusing on: (1) the causes and
effects of the contractor&apos;s delays in delivering acceptable trucks; and
(2) the Army&apos;s actions to mitigate corrosion problems on FMTV trucks.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) a combination of factors caused lengthy delays in
delivering FMTV trucks; (2) the Army did not execute a low-risk
acquisition strategy; (3) the contract contained an aggressive schedule
for truck production considering the contractor&apos;s inexperience; (4) the
inexperienced contractor had difficulty in both establishing a
production line and producing trucks that could meet qualification and
operational testing requirements; (5) despite the difficulties, the Army
allowed production to continue and increase during testing; (6) as a
result, many trucks were produced that required modification or repair;
(7) because of production problems and competing funding requirements,
the Army decided in 1994 to terminate the final year of the original
5-year FMTV production contract; (8) the Army requested only enough
funding for fiscal year 1996 to terminate the program; (9) Congress, not
wanting a break in the program, provided additional funding for that
year, but not enough to fully fund the production quantities called for
in the contract; (10) the Army and the contractor agreed to extend the
contract and spread the final year&apos;s quantities over 3 years; (11) the
Army determined that the first 4,955 trucks produced did not meet the
FMTV&apos;s corrosion protection requirements; (12) corrosion was found on
the cabs of trucks less than 3 years old that were still awaiting
modification at the contractor&apos;s plant; (13) rather than making the
contractor replace all the 4,955 truck cabs at a cost of $31 million,
the Army accepted the contractor&apos;s proposal to repair the corrosion
damage and to provide a 10-year warranty, not to exceed $10 million,
against any future corrosion; (14) the Army also subjected one of the
4,955 trucks to a contract-specified corrosion test; (15) it failed with
corrosion being detected in 60 areas; (16) following these events, the
Army and the contractor agreed on modified production procedures to
address the corrosion problem on subsequently produced trucks; (17)
however, the Army and the contractor ultimately concluded that
galvanized steel cabs may be required to meet the 10-year corrosion
prevention requirement and the contract was modified to require
galvanized steel cabs; (18) the contract&apos;s final 3,751 trucks were
produced with galvanized steel cabs; (19) the Army agreed to pay up to
$7 million for the galvanized steel cabs and other corrosion
improvements; and (20) the Army did not test or require the contractor
to provide a corrosion warranty on the 2,491 trucks produced prior to
the switch to galvanized steel cabs.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-26/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-26.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-26/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-26.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-99-26</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-26</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-99-26; Army Medium Trucks: Information on Delivery Delays and Corrosion Problems;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Army procurement</topic>
 <topic>Department of Defense contractors</topic>
 <topic>Military land vehicles</topic>
 <topic>Concurrency</topic>
 <topic>Schedule slippages</topic>
 <topic>Contract modifications</topic>
 <topic>Quality control</topic>
 <topic>Product evaluation</topic>
 <topic>Contract oversight</topic>
 <topic>Family of Medium Tactical Vehicles</topic>
</subject>
</mods>