<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18038f966">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999-08-11</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>38 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-99-176</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-176</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18038f966</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns99176</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-23</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-176</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-176</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-99-176</reportNumber>
 <subject>Space exploration</subject>
 <subject>Aerospace contracts</subject>
 <subject>Aerospace engineering</subject>
 <subject>Schedule slippages</subject>
 <subject>Contract oversight</subject>
 <subject>Joint ventures</subject>
 <subject>Cooperative agreements</subject>
 <subject>Cost overruns</subject>
 <identifier>NASA X-33 Program</identifier>
 <identifier>Venture Star Reusable Launch Vehicle</identifier>
 <identifier>NASA International Space Station Alpha Program</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Space Transportation: Status of the X-33 Reusable Launch</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on the
status of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration&apos;s (NASA)
X-33 Program, focusing on: (1) whether the X-33 Program is meeting the
cost, schedule, and performance objectives established in the X-33
cooperative agreement; (2) how NASA&apos;s oversight responsibility was
changed by the cooperative agreement; and (3) potential issues NASA may
face as it moves toward a decision on whether to use Venture Star
reusable launch vehicles (RLV) to service the International Space
Station.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) NASA and Lockheed Martin X-33 program managers
anticipate that the program will achieve technical requirements; (2)
however, the program will not meet some original cost, schedule, and
performance objectives; (3) problems encountered by Lockheed Martin
while working toward the X-33 Program&apos;s technical requirements have
caused cost increases, delay of the test vehicle&apos;s first flight, and
revision of some performance objectives; (4) the technical problems
occurred during development and fabrication of the X-33 vehicle&apos;s
internal fuel tanks, rocket engines, and thermal protection system, the
three key advanced technologies the program seeks to demonstrate; (5)
the estimated costs increased from $216.9 million to $274.3 million as
of March 1999; (6) the first flight of the X-33 vehicle was delayed 16
months, from March 1999 to July 2000; (7) this could delay NASA&apos;s
decision about whether to invest in space shuttle fleet upgrades or rely
on new launch vehicles such as Venture Star; (8) the technical problems
and schedule constraints also resulted in changes to program performance
objectives; (9) to implement the terms of the X-33 cooperative
agreement, NASA assigned to Lockheed Martin the leadership role in
executing the X-33 Program; (10) according to NASA&apos;s X-33 program
manager, the agency&apos;s oversight is different from that used for
traditional development contracts, as it relies on insight gained from
NASA employees working alongside Lockheed Martin personnel; (11) several
issues will need to be evaluated before NASA decides to use Venture Star
RLVs to support the International Space Station; (12) the results of the
X-33 Program must provide sufficient information for NASA to determine
that the risks have been sufficiently reduced and that continuation of
activities leading to the agency&apos;s use of Venture Star as a customer is
warranted; (13) even though Venture Star RLVs are intended to be
commercially owned and operated, government financial incentives will
likely be needed to initiate such a venture; (14) NASA would have to pay
for either two crew modules or modifications to Venture Star vehicles if
the crew return vehicle being developed for the International Space
Station is chosen as a means for Venture Star to carry people; (15)
because the Venture Star RLV would not carry as much cargo as the space
shuttle, additional flights would be needed; and (16) NASA&apos;s Fiscal Year
2000 Performance Plan does not include performance targets that
establish a clear path leading from the X-33 Program flight-test vehicle
to an operational single-stage-to-orbit vehicle.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-176/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-176.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-176/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-176.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-99-176</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-176</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-99-176; Space Transportation: Status of the X-33 Reusable Launch;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Space exploration</topic>
 <topic>Aerospace contracts</topic>
 <topic>Aerospace engineering</topic>
 <topic>Schedule slippages</topic>
 <topic>Contract oversight</topic>
 <topic>Joint ventures</topic>
 <topic>Cooperative agreements</topic>
 <topic>Cost overruns</topic>
 <topic>NASA X-33 Program</topic>
 <topic>Venture Star Reusable Launch Vehicle</topic>
 <topic>NASA International Space Station Alpha Program</topic>
</subject>
</mods>