<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18038bbf9">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-11-13</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>56 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-99-17</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-17</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18038bbf9</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns99017</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-17</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-17</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-99-17</reportNumber>
 <subject>Base closures</subject>
 <subject>Military downsizing</subject>
 <subject>Reporting requirements</subject>
 <subject>Military cost control</subject>
 <subject>Military bases</subject>
 <subject>Base realignments</subject>
 <subject>Federal agency reorganization</subject>
 <subject>Obsolete facilities</subject>
 <subject>Economic analysis</subject>
 <subject>Cost effectiveness analysis</subject>
 <identifier>DOD Quadrennial Defense Review</identifier>
 <identifier>DOD Future Years Defense Program</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
 <law congress="101" isPrivate="false" number="510"></law>
 <law congress="105" isPrivate="false" number="85"></law>
 <USCode title="10">
                      <section number="2687"></section>
                </USCode>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Military Bases: Review of DOD&apos;s 1998 Report on Base Realignment and Closure</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a legislative requirement, GAO reviewed the Department of
Defense&apos;s (DOD) report on the costs and savings attributable to the
rounds of base realignments and closures (BRAC), focusing on: (1) the
costs and savings of prior BRAC rounds and estimated costs and savings
of future BRAC rounds; (2) the impact of prior BRAC rounds on military
capabilities, excess capacity, base reuse and economic recovery of
communities affected by BRAC actions; and (3) processes DOD would use to
select bases for closure and realignments should further BRAC rounds be
authorized.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) DOD&apos;s report to Congress provided most, but not all,
of the information required in section 2824 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998; (2) in selected instances,
usually because data were not available, DOD either did not provide the
information required or did not provide it in the level of specificity
required; (3) DOD&apos;s report concludes that the four prior BRAC rounds,
taken in aggregate, are saving DOD billions of dollars annually; (4)
GAO&apos;s prior work examining BRAC cost and savings and related issues
affirms that past BRAC recommendations will result in substantial
savings once implementation costs have been offset and net savings begin
to accrue; (5) however, because of data and records weaknesses, DOD&apos;s
report should be viewed as providing a rough approximation of costs and
savings rather than a precise accounting; (6) DOD&apos;s data systems do not
capture all savings associated with BRAC actions, nor has DOD
established a separate system to track BRAC savings; (7) DOD&apos;s estimates
of costs and savings for future BRAC rounds should also be viewed as
rough estimates because there is no assurance that the cost and savings
experiences from prior BRAC rounds will be precisely replicated in the
future; (8) because the methodology used to identify excess capacity has
a number of limitations, DOD&apos;s report gives only a rough indication that
excess capacity has increased relative to force structure since 1989;
(9) however, other DOD studies, statements by DOD officials, and GAO&apos;s
prior work support the report&apos;s general conclusion that DOD continues to
retain excess capacity; (10) GAO&apos;s work has shown this to be the case,
particularly in maintenance depots and in research, development, test,
and evaluation facilities; (11) DOD&apos;s analysis of operational and
readiness indicators have shown no long-term problems affecting military
capabilities that can be related to BRAC actions; (12) this general
conclusion is also consistent with GAO&apos;s prior work; (13) DOD&apos;s report
emphasizes that communities affected by prior BRAC actions appear to be
rebounding economically; (14) GAO also found this to be the case,
although its work also shows that some communities are faring better
than others; (15) DOD&apos;s report suggests that proposed BRAC rounds in
2001 and 2005 would be conducted like prior rounds; and (16) DOD&apos;s
legislative proposal requesting authority to conduct two additional BRAC
rounds provides a good starting point for considering future
legislation, should Congress decide to authorize additional rounds.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-17/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-17.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-17/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-17.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-99-17</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-17</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-99-17; Military Bases: Review of DOD&apos;s 1998 Report on Base Realignment and Closure;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Base closures</topic>
 <topic>Military downsizing</topic>
 <topic>Reporting requirements</topic>
 <topic>Military cost control</topic>
 <topic>Military bases</topic>
 <topic>Base realignments</topic>
 <topic>Federal agency reorganization</topic>
 <topic>Obsolete facilities</topic>
 <topic>Economic analysis</topic>
 <topic>Cost effectiveness analysis</topic>
 <topic>DOD Quadrennial Defense Review</topic>
 <topic>DOD Future Years Defense Program</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 10 Section 2687</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">10 U.S.C. 2687</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 510 (101st Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 101-510</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 85 (105th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 105-85</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>