<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee1803876d9">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999-07-08</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>36 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-99-147</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-147</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee1803876d9</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns99147</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-147</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-147</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-99-147</reportNumber>
 <subject>Equipment maintenance</subject>
 <subject>Strategic planning</subject>
 <subject>Military cost control</subject>
 <subject>Department of Defense contractors</subject>
 <subject>Defense capabilities</subject>
 <subject>Logistics</subject>
 <subject>Military aircraft</subject>
 <subject>Cost effectiveness analysis</subject>
 <subject>Air Force procurement</subject>
 <subject>Privatization</subject>
 <identifier>C-17 Aircraft</identifier>
 <identifier>Air Force C-17 Aircraft Logistics Support Plan</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
 <law congress="105" isPrivate="false" number="261"></law>
 <USCode title="10">
                      <section number="2461"></section>
                      <section number="2464"></section>
                      <section number="2466"></section>
                      <section number="2474"></section>
                      <section number="2553"></section>
                </USCode>
 <congReport congress="104" number="286" type="S"></congReport>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Air Force Logistics: C-17 Support Plan Does Not Adequately</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>The Air Force is working to pilot test a new logistics support concept
for the C-17 aircraft that relies more on the private sector. The Air
Force plan supporting this idea that was sent to Congress has three key
shortcomings that need to be addressed so that the pilots&apos; merits can be
adequately assessed. First, the plan does not identify C-17 core
requirements or provide information on a process for establishing the
capabilities needed to support such requirements. Second, the Air
Force&apos;s conclusions that C-17 depot maintenance would be less
cost-effective in Air Force depots are not adequately supported. Third,
GAO questions whether the Air Force plan could be implemented under
current law. The Air Force is required to determine that the services to
be obtained from public depots are not commercially available. Past Air
Force assessments have shown that commercial sources are available that
can perform depot maintenance on the same or similar commodities for
other aircraft.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-147/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-147.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-147/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-147.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-99-147</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-147</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-99-147; Air Force Logistics: C-17 Support Plan Does Not Adequately;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Equipment maintenance</topic>
 <topic>Strategic planning</topic>
 <topic>Military cost control</topic>
 <topic>Department of Defense contractors</topic>
 <topic>Defense capabilities</topic>
 <topic>Logistics</topic>
 <topic>Military aircraft</topic>
 <topic>Cost effectiveness analysis</topic>
 <topic>Air Force procurement</topic>
 <topic>Privatization</topic>
 <topic>C-17 Aircraft</topic>
 <topic>Air Force C-17 Aircraft Logistics Support Plan</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 10 Section 2461</partNumber>
  <partNumber>Title 10 Section 2464</partNumber>
  <partNumber>Title 10 Section 2466</partNumber>
  <partNumber>Title 10 Section 2474</partNumber>
  <partNumber>Title 10 Section 2553</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">10 U.S.C. 2461</identifier>
 <identifier type="USC citation">10 U.S.C. 2464</identifier>
 <identifier type="USC citation">10 U.S.C. 2466</identifier>
 <identifier type="USC citation">10 U.S.C. 2474</identifier>
 <identifier type="USC citation">10 U.S.C. 2553</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 261 (105th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 105-261</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Senate Report 286 (104th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="congressional report citation">S. Rept. 104-286</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>