<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee1803963d7">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999-06-30</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>23 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-99-142</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-142</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee1803963d7</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns99142</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-142</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-142</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-99-142</reportNumber>
 <subject>Ballistic missiles</subject>
 <subject>Air defense systems</subject>
 <subject>Defense contingency planning</subject>
 <subject>Cost plus fixed fee contracts</subject>
 <subject>Defense capabilities</subject>
 <subject>Operational testing</subject>
 <subject>Department of Defense contractors</subject>
 <subject>Weapons systems</subject>
 <identifier>THAADS User Operational Evaluation System</identifier>
 <identifier>THAADS</identifier>
 <identifier>SDI Theater High Altitude Area Defense System</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Missile Defense: THAAD Restructure Addresses Problems But</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Studies done by the military and independent sources cited the following
problems in the Theater High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) Program:
First, the program&apos;s compressed flight-test schedule did not allow for
adequate ground testing, and officials could not spot problems before
flight tests. The schedule also left too little time for preflight
testing, postflight analysis, and corrective measures. Second, the
requirement that an early prototype system be deployed quickly has
diverted attention from the normal interceptor development process and
resulted in interceptors that were not equipped with sufficient
instruments to provide optimum test data. Third, quality assurance
received too little emphasis and resources during component production,
resulting in unreliable components. Fourth, the contract to develop the
interceptor was a cost-plus-fixed-fee contract, which placed all of the
financial risk on the government and did not hold the contractor
accountable for less than optimum performance. The restructure program
addresses each of these four underlying problems. However, the
reliability of current flight-test interceptors remains a concern
because most components were produced when the contractor&apos;s quality
assurance system was inadequate. Test failures caused primarily by
manufacturing defects rather than advanced technology problems have
prevented the Army from demonstrating that THAAD can reliably intercept
targets in all required regions. The restructuring of the THAAD program
raised the issue of what the purpose of the User Operational Evaluation
System battalion at Fort Bliss should now be. Whether all or only part
of the battalion would warrant deployment for contingency operations
would depend on the capabilities it could provide to warfighters and the
priority of the need for one or more of those capabilities. However,
there would be little basis for making a deployment determination
because the Defense Department does not plan to conduct an operational
assessment of the User Operational Evaluation System.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-142/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-142.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-142/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-142.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-99-142</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-142</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-99-142; Missile Defense: THAAD Restructure Addresses Problems But;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Ballistic missiles</topic>
 <topic>Air defense systems</topic>
 <topic>Defense contingency planning</topic>
 <topic>Cost plus fixed fee contracts</topic>
 <topic>Defense capabilities</topic>
 <topic>Operational testing</topic>
 <topic>Department of Defense contractors</topic>
 <topic>Weapons systems</topic>
 <topic>THAADS User Operational Evaluation System</topic>
 <topic>THAADS</topic>
 <topic>SDI Theater High Altitude Area Defense System</topic>
</subject>
</mods>