<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18038e317">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999-09-07</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>165 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-99-100</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-100</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18038e317</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns99100</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-23</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-100</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-100</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-99-100</reportNumber>
 <subject>Military facilities</subject>
 <subject>Facility maintenance</subject>
 <subject>Maintenance costs</subject>
 <subject>Military budgets</subject>
 <subject>Facility repairs</subject>
 <subject>Private sector practices</subject>
 <subject>Funds management</subject>
 <subject>Federal property management</subject>
 <identifier>DOD Quadrennial Defense Review</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
 <accountNo>F7218</accountNo>
 <USCode title="16">
                      <section number="11411"></section>
                      <section number="470h-2"></section>
                </USCode>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Military Infrastructure: Real Property Management Needs</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Department of
Defense&apos;s (DOD) management of the maintenance of its real properties,
focusing on: (1) how the services determine and prioritize maintenance
and repair requirements and how they allocate resources to meet their
needs; (2) promising practices in facility management that the services
could consider; and (3) barriers to implementing promising practices and
ways to address them.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) DOD does not have a comprehensive strategy for
maintaining the services&apos; infrastructure; (2) rather, each service sets
its own standards for maintaining infrastructure; (3) as a result, the
services differ in the way they rate property conditions, prioritize
repairs, and allocate resources; (4) the service headquarters cannot be
certain that the most critical properties in need of maintenance and
repair are targeted; (5) given incomplete and inconsistent data, and
different real property maintenance (RPM) rating systems among the
services, Congress cannot be assured that it is funding maintenance and
repairs that will provide the best return on its investment; (6) there
is little relationship between identified RPM needs and the funds the
services allocate for RPM; (7) none of the services&apos; RPM spending plans
provide sufficient funding to keep their total backlog of repairs at
current levels; (8) although DOD instructed the services in July 1997 to
fund RPM to enable them to meet 75 percent of their RPM requirements by
2003, DOD removed that goal from an update guidance in April 1999; (9)
because the services&apos; headquarters consistently underfund requirements,
base and command officials request funding to cover only a portion of
RPM needs; (10) for fiscal year 1997, major commands GAO surveyed
reported they requested funding to cover an average of about one-fifth
of the RPM needs of their bases and bases reported receiving funding
equal to only about one-sixth of their needs; (11) many promising
practices exist in the RPM area, including: (a) establishing a single
system for counting and categorizing inventory; (b) having a single,
valid engineering-based system for assessing facility conditions, with
adequately trained personnel and multiple levels of review; (c)
prioritizing budget allocations based on physical condition, relevance
of facilities to the mission, and life-cycle costing and budgeting; (d)
setting up a single property maintenance budget that is controlled by a
central office with the power to shift resources to facilities in the
greatest need; (e) creating incentives to demolish or vacate excess
space; (f) restricting the use of RPM funds for other maintenance
purposes; and (g) charging an annual maintenance fee, based on square
feet used, to ensure adequate funding for facilities and to create an
incentive for space conservation; and (12) none of the military services
has implemented all the promising practices for RPM, and their adoption
of these practices is hampered by several barriers.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-100/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-100.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-100/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-100.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-99-100</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-100</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-99-100; Military Infrastructure: Real Property Management Needs;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Military facilities</topic>
 <topic>Facility maintenance</topic>
 <topic>Maintenance costs</topic>
 <topic>Military budgets</topic>
 <topic>Facility repairs</topic>
 <topic>Private sector practices</topic>
 <topic>Funds management</topic>
 <topic>Federal property management</topic>
 <topic>DOD Quadrennial Defense Review</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 16 Section 11411</partNumber>
  <partNumber>Title 16 Section 470h-2</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">16 U.S.C. 11411</identifier>
 <identifier type="USC citation">16 U.S.C. 470h-2</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>