<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180397887">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-04-21</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>27 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-98-93</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-93</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180397887</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns98093</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-23</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-93</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-93</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-98-93</reportNumber>
 <subject>Naval personnel</subject>
 <subject>Naval bases</subject>
 <subject>Naval supplies</subject>
 <subject>Military vessels</subject>
 <subject>Shipyards</subject>
 <subject>Temporary employment</subject>
 <subject>Equipment maintenance</subject>
 <subject>Cost effectiveness analysis</subject>
 <subject>Privatization</subject>
 <subject>Human resources utilization</subject>
 <identifier>Navy Regional Maintenance Program</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
 <USCode title="10">
                      <section number="2466"></section>
                </USCode>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Navy Ship Maintenance: Temporary Duty Assignments of Temporarily Excess Shipyard Personnel Are Reasonable</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a legislative requirement, GAO reviewed the Navy&apos;s practice
of using temporary duty assignments of naval personnel to perform ship
maintenance and repair work at homeports without nearby naval shipyard
capability, focusing on the: (1) rationale supporting the Navy&apos;s
practice; (2) cost-effectiveness of these assignments; and (3) factors
affecting future requirements for the practice.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) the Navy&apos;s rationale for temporary duty assignments
is twofold; (2) such assignments are required to perform work at
locations where no local public or private shipyards have the required
depot-level maintenance capability; (3) most temporary duty assignments
are for this reason; (4) the Navy performs work at such locations to
comply with its policy to perform ship repairs of six months or less at
the ship&apos;s homeport and when it is not practical to bring ships to the
shipyard; (5) the Navy believes that using temporarily excess naval
shipyard workers on temporary duty assignment is cost-effective, even
when there is local private sector capability because these workers will
be needed in the future to perform ship repair work; (6) the Navy&apos;s
rationale for sending temporarily excess naval shipyard personnel on
temporary duty assignments appears reasonable from a cost and
operational standpoint; (7) however, in some cases, other approaches may
be more cost-effective; (8) the Navy is currently retaining some
temporarily excess shipyard personnel to ensure that it can handle the
planned refuelings of nuclear attack submarines for fiscal year (FY)
1999 and beyond; (9) retaining the personnel for these purposes appears
reasonable, since the Navy has a need for the personnel; (10) it is
following the same practice to perform nuclear ship repair work at San
Diego because local private shipyards do not have nuclear capability;
(11) however, other approaches, such as making greater use of the
private sector, may warrant consideration; (12) possible changes to
future ship repair workloads could affect the requirement for future
temporary duty assignments and retention of current naval shipyard
personnel levels; (13) for example, the Navy has cancelled 17 planned
nuclear attack submarine refuelings since FY 1993; (14) further
reductions in the number of planned refuelings would substantially
decrease the on-site workloads planned for three naval shipyards,
especially Portsmouth; (15) a proposal to homeport three nuclear
aircraft carriers in San Diego, California, which does not have a local
naval shipyard, could substantially increase temporary duty assignments;
and (16) other factors that could affect the amount of future temporary
duty assignments include: (a) further reductions in the number of Navy
ships; (b) full implementation of the Navy&apos;s Regional Maintenance
Program; and (c) a new round of base closures.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-93/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-93.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-93/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-93.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-98-93</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-93</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-98-93; Navy Ship Maintenance: Temporary Duty Assignments of Temporarily Excess Shipyard Personnel Are Reasonable;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Naval personnel</topic>
 <topic>Naval bases</topic>
 <topic>Naval supplies</topic>
 <topic>Military vessels</topic>
 <topic>Shipyards</topic>
 <topic>Temporary employment</topic>
 <topic>Equipment maintenance</topic>
 <topic>Cost effectiveness analysis</topic>
 <topic>Privatization</topic>
 <topic>Human resources utilization</topic>
 <topic>Navy Regional Maintenance Program</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 10 Section 2466</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">10 U.S.C. 2466</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>