<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180397f98">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997-12-08</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>32 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-98-48</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-48</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180397f98</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns98048</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-48</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-48</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-98-48</reportNumber>
 <subject>Defense cost control</subject>
 <subject>Military downsizing</subject>
 <subject>Future budget projections</subject>
 <subject>Privatization</subject>
 <subject>Cost effectiveness analysis</subject>
 <subject>Defense procurement</subject>
 <subject>Military inventories</subject>
 <subject>Reductions in force</subject>
 <subject>Logistics</subject>
 <subject>Program evaluation</subject>
 <identifier>DOD Quadrennial Defense Review</identifier>
 <identifier>DOD Prime Vendor Program</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
 <law congress="99" isPrivate="false" number="661"></law>
 <USCode title="10">
                      <section number="2305"></section>
                      <section number="2460"></section>
                      <section number="2461"></section>
                      <section number="2464"></section>
                      <section number="2465"></section>
                      <section number="2466"></section>
                      <section number="4532"></section>
                </USCode>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Outsourcing DOD Logistics: Savings Achievable But Defense Science Board&apos;s Projections Are Overstated</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the basis for the
Defense Science Board&apos;s (DSB) estimate that the Department of Defense
(DOD) could potentially save $6 billion annually by reducing its
logistics infrastructure costs within the continental United States,
focusing on: (1) the opportunities for logistics infrastructure savings;
and (2) DOD&apos;s and GAO&apos;s analyses of the DSB&apos;s projected logistics
infrastructure savings.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) GAO agrees with the DSB that DOD can reduce the
costs of its logistics activities through outsourcing and other
initiatives; (2) DOD has already achieved over $700 million in savings
from the use of a prime vendor program and other inventory-related
reduction efforts for defense medical supplies; (3) according to studies
by the Center for Naval Analyses, competition for work, including
competition between the public sector and the private sector--regardless
of which one wins--can result in cost savings; (4) many private sector
firms have successfully used outsourcing to reduce their costs of
operations; (5) the DOD Program Analysis and Evaluation (PA&amp;E)
directorate&apos;s analysis shows, however, that the DSB&apos;s estimated annual
savings of $6 billion is overstated by about $4 billion because of
errors in estimates, overly optimistic savings assumptions, and legal
and cultural impediments; (6) according to PA&amp;E&apos;s analysis, this $4
billion includes: (a) $1 billion in overstated contract administration
and oversight savings and one-time inventory savings; and (b) $3 billion
in savings that would be unlikely or would be difficult to achieve
within the Board&apos;s 6-year time frame, given certain legislative
requirements and DOD&apos;s resistance to outsourcing all logistics
functions; (7) GAO&apos;s analysis confirmed PA&amp;E&apos;s conclusion that the
Board&apos;s estimated savings were overstated; (8) GAO&apos;s analysis also
raised questions about the Board&apos;s projected savings, but GAO does not
know by how much or whether these questions would change the $2 billion
in savings that PA&amp;E concluded were achievable; (9) GAO questioned
whether DOD would achieve a 25-percent savings from outsourcing, as the
Board assumed, because the savings were based primarily on studies of
public-private competitions in highly competitive private sector
markets; (10) however, competitive markets may not exist in some areas;
(11) notwithstanding GAO&apos;s concerns about the magnitude of savings, DOD
can make significant reductions in logistics costs; (12) the Secretary
of Defense recently issued a strategic plan for achieving such
reductions; (13) this report is a step in the right direction; and (14)
DOD now needs an implementation plan based on a realistic assessment of
the savings potential of various cost-reduction alternatives and the
time frames for accomplishing various activities required to identify
and implement the most cost-effective solutions.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-48/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-48.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-48/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-48.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-98-48</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-48</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-98-48; Outsourcing DOD Logistics: Savings Achievable But Defense Science Board&apos;s Projections Are Overstated;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Defense cost control</topic>
 <topic>Military downsizing</topic>
 <topic>Future budget projections</topic>
 <topic>Privatization</topic>
 <topic>Cost effectiveness analysis</topic>
 <topic>Defense procurement</topic>
 <topic>Military inventories</topic>
 <topic>Reductions in force</topic>
 <topic>Logistics</topic>
 <topic>Program evaluation</topic>
 <topic>DOD Quadrennial Defense Review</topic>
 <topic>DOD Prime Vendor Program</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 10 Section 2305</partNumber>
  <partNumber>Title 10 Section 2460</partNumber>
  <partNumber>Title 10 Section 2461</partNumber>
  <partNumber>Title 10 Section 2464</partNumber>
  <partNumber>Title 10 Section 2465</partNumber>
  <partNumber>Title 10 Section 2466</partNumber>
  <partNumber>Title 10 Section 4532</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">10 U.S.C. 2305</identifier>
 <identifier type="USC citation">10 U.S.C. 2460</identifier>
 <identifier type="USC citation">10 U.S.C. 2461</identifier>
 <identifier type="USC citation">10 U.S.C. 2464</identifier>
 <identifier type="USC citation">10 U.S.C. 2465</identifier>
 <identifier type="USC citation">10 U.S.C. 2466</identifier>
 <identifier type="USC citation">10 U.S.C. 4532</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 661 (99th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 99-661</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>