<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180376833">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-09-16</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>52 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-98-196</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-196</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180376833</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns98196</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-196</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-196</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-98-196</reportNumber>
 <subject>Export regulation</subject>
 <subject>Foreign trade agreements</subject>
 <subject>International relations</subject>
 <subject>Foreign governments</subject>
 <subject>Technology transfer</subject>
 <subject>Computer equipment industry</subject>
 <subject>Supercomputers</subject>
 <subject>Dual-use technologies</subject>
 <subject>Foreign trade policies</subject>
 <subject>Nuclear proliferation</subject>
 <identifier>Japan</identifier>
 <identifier>Germany</identifier>
 <identifier>United Kingdom</identifier>
 <identifier>China</identifier>
 <identifier>Russia</identifier>
 <identifier>France</identifier>
 <identifier>India</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
 <law congress="105" isPrivate="false" number="85"></law>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Export Controls: Information on the Decision to Revise High Performance Computer Controls</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a legislative requirement and a congressional request, GAO
reviewed concerns that U.S. national security interests may have been
compromised by sales of unlicensed high performance computers (HPC) to
China and Russia, focusing on: (1) the basis for the executive branch&apos;s
revision of HPC export controls; (2) changes in licensing activities and
the implementation of certain U.S. licensing and export enforcement
requirements since the revision; and (3) the current foreign
availability of HPCs, particularly for certain countries of national
security concern.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) a Stanford University study on foreign availability
of HPCs was a key element in the decision to revise HPC export controls;
(2) however, GAO&apos;s analysis of the study showed that it had 2
significant limitations; (3) first, the study lacked empirical evidence
or analysis to support its conclusion that HPCs were uncontrollable
based on worldwide availability and insufficient resources to control
them; (4) second, the study did not assess the capabilities of countries
of concern to use HPCs for military and other national security
applications; (5) the study&apos;s principal author said that U.S. government
data was insufficient to make such an assessment, and the study
recommended that better data be gathered so that such an analysis could
be done in the future; (6) the executive branch did not undertake a
threat analysis of providing HPCs to countries of concern, but raised
the computing power thresholds for HPC export controls and established a
four-tier control structure; (7) the 1996 revision to HPC export
controls had three key consequences; (8) the number of computer export
licenses issued declined from 395 in the fiscal year 1995 to 42 in 1997;
(9) U.S. HPC exporters were charged with responsibilities previously
conducted by the government, including screening and reporting on the
end use and end user of HPCs; (10) the regulation required HPC
manufacturers to keep records of the end users of all their HPC exports
over 2,000 million theoretical operations per second (MTOPS); (11) to
date, information on these exports reported to the government has been
incomplete; (12) responsibility for postshipment verification (PSV)
checks remained with the government; (13) however, because of how PSVs
for computers are implemented, their value is reduced because they
verify the physical location of a HPC, but not how it is used; (14)
subsidiaries of U.S. computer manufacturers dominate the overseas HPC
market, and they must comply with U.S. controls; (15) three Japanese
companies are global competitors of U.S. manufacturers, two of which
told GAO that they had no sales to tier 3 countries such as Russia and
China; (16) Japan, Germany and the United Kingdom each have export
controls on HPCs similar to those of the United States, according to
foreign government officials; (17) Russia, China, and India have
developed HPCs, but the capabilities of their computers are believed to
be limited; and (18) thus, GAO&apos;s analysis suggests that HPCs over 2,000
MTOPS are not readily available to tier 3 countries from foreign sources
without restrictions.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-196/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-196.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-196/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-196.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-98-196</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-196</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-98-196; Export Controls: Information on the Decision to Revise High Performance Computer Controls;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Export regulation</topic>
 <topic>Foreign trade agreements</topic>
 <topic>International relations</topic>
 <topic>Foreign governments</topic>
 <topic>Technology transfer</topic>
 <topic>Computer equipment industry</topic>
 <topic>Supercomputers</topic>
 <topic>Dual-use technologies</topic>
 <topic>Foreign trade policies</topic>
 <topic>Nuclear proliferation</topic>
 <topic>Japan</topic>
 <topic>Germany</topic>
 <topic>United Kingdom</topic>
 <topic>China</topic>
 <topic>Russia</topic>
 <topic>France</topic>
 <topic>India</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 85 (105th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 105-85</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>