<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18039c57a">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997-10-30</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>23 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-98-16</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-16</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18039c57a</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns98016</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-16</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-16</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-98-16</reportNumber>
 <subject>Munitions</subject>
 <subject>Missiles</subject>
 <subject>Product performance evaluation</subject>
 <subject>Concurrency</subject>
 <subject>Testing</subject>
 <subject>Weapons research</subject>
 <subject>Air defense systems</subject>
 <identifier>Army Tactical Missile System</identifier>
 <identifier>Brilliant Anti-Armor Submunition</identifier>
 <identifier>ATACMS Block II Missile</identifier>
 <identifier>ATACMS Block IA Missile</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Brilliant Anti-Armor Submunition: Opportunity Exists to Conduct Critical Test Prior to Production Decision</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided its assessment of the
Army&apos;s brilliant antiarmor submunition (BAT), for which the Army plans
to request authority to start low-rate initial production in December
1997, focusing on the status of its acquisition plans and whether it is
technically ready to enter production.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) a decision on low-rate initial production of BAT,
scheduled for December 1997, appears to be premature because a crucial
technical demonstration will not be accomplished by that time; (2) in
1995, the Office of the Secretary of Defense and the Army agreed to
relax the performance criteria that BAT was to meet before proceeding
into low-rate initial production; (3) under the new criteria, the Army
is not required to demonstrate that the submunition can be successfully
dispensed from the Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) Block II
missile; (4) in September 1994, the Department of Defense (DOD) noted,
in its comments to GAO&apos;s draft classified report, that the successful
completion of multiple tests of the submunition with ATACMS as the
carrier would be required; (5) the submunition&apos;s test schedule appears
to be extremely ambitious; (6) its development program is almost 3 years
behind its original schedule, and a significant portion of the test
schedule remains uncompleted; (7) the project office added five
development flight tests to the schedule because of technical problems;
(8) the Army plans to use a test aircraft for all submunition flight
testing with subsonic deployment rather than the supersonic deployment
from the ATACMS missile; (9) the testing completed to date has uncovered
numerous problems that required design changes, additional testing, and
schedule delays; (10) although the submunition test plans do not include
an evaluation of whether or not the ATACMS Block II can dispense the
submunition, the Block II missile test plans do include a test to
dispense tactical submunitions in December 1997, the same month that the
decision is to be made on low-rate production of the submunition; (11)
according to Army representatives, data from this test will not be used
in making the submunition production decision, since the test is not
required; (12) any delays in qualifying the submunition&apos;s subcomponents
and developmental flight testing will likely postpone the date of the
Block II dispense test; (13) the submunition&apos;s low-rate initial
production contract can be awarded 8 months later than currently
scheduled and still be delivered in time to be integrated into the
missile; (14) the Block II missile&apos;s currently scheduled production date
is uncertain; and (15) if its production date is delayed, the Army would
have even more time to sufficiently complete key submunition
developmental testing.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-16/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-16.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-16/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-16.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-98-16</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-16</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-98-16; Brilliant Anti-Armor Submunition: Opportunity Exists to Conduct Critical Test Prior to Production Decision;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Munitions</topic>
 <topic>Missiles</topic>
 <topic>Product performance evaluation</topic>
 <topic>Concurrency</topic>
 <topic>Testing</topic>
 <topic>Weapons research</topic>
 <topic>Air defense systems</topic>
 <topic>Army Tactical Missile System</topic>
 <topic>Brilliant Anti-Armor Submunition</topic>
 <topic>ATACMS Block II Missile</topic>
 <topic>ATACMS Block IA Missile</topic>
</subject>
</mods>