<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee1803803c4">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-06-16</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>28 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-98-152</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-152</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee1803803c4</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns98152</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-152</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-152</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-98-152</reportNumber>
 <subject>Weapons systems</subject>
 <subject>Air Force procurement</subject>
 <subject>Bomber aircraft</subject>
 <subject>Defense capabilities</subject>
 <subject>Future budget projections</subject>
 <subject>Concurrency</subject>
 <subject>Military cost control</subject>
 <identifier>B-2A Aircraft</identifier>
 <identifier>B-1B Aircraft</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>B-2 Bomber: Additional Costs to Correct Deficiencies and Make Improvements</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a legislative requirement, GAO reviewed the total
acquisition costs of the B-2A bomber, focusing on: (1) deficiencies that
must be corrected to achieve Air Force objectives for the B-2A; (2)
additional costs to correct the deficiencies; and (3) the B-2A
modification schedule.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) the Air Force evaluated the B-2A capability to meet
several broad objectives--strike rapidly, sustaining operations, deploy
to forward locations, survive in hostile environments, and accurately
deliver weapons; (2) the November 1997 operational test reports
concluded that B-2As, in the block 30 configuration, are operationally
effective, but with several important deficiencies that limit the
aircraft&apos;s ability to fully meet those objectives as planned; (3) the
test reports identify four deficiencies: (a) incomplete development of
the automated ground mission planning system, which is needed to rapidly
plan and carry out B-2A strike missions; (b) unsatisfactory performance
of the defensive avionics system, which is used to provide enemy threat
information to the crews and increase their survivability in certain
situations; (c) inadequate reliability and maintainability of low
observable materials and structures, reducing the ability to sustain the
defined pace of operations while maintaining a high degree of
survivability for conventional B-2A missions; and (d) lack of
environmental shelters to maintain low observable materials and to
protect the aircraft from certain weather conditions during deployment;
(4) the fiscal year 1999 B-2A cost estimate identifies the cost to
complete the B-2A program for the block 30 configuration at $44.3
billion then-year dollars; (5) included in this figure is funding to
correct or improve some, but not all, of the deficiencies listed above;
(6) for example, the estimate does not include the additional costs that
would be incurred if defensive avionics were to be required to achieve
the originally planned capability, which Department of Defense officials
said is no longer required at this time; (7) however, it does include
funding for software upgrades to improve the system performance, which
meets current operational objectives; (8) further, it does not include
the cost to improve low observable materials, which are needed to
sustain the pace of B-2A operations, and to provide for a sufficient
number of deployment shelters to accommodate repairs to B-2As; (9) the
estimate also excludes costs to buy spare parts that are being
identified to support the B-2A&apos;s nuclear mission; (10) modifications of
B-2As to the block 30 configuration have not been accomplished on
schedule; (11) four modified aircraft were delivered as of April
1998--three later than scheduled and one ahead of schedule; and (12)
according to the Air Force, the contractor has had difficulty hiring
enough personnel to achieve the schedule.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-152/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-152.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-152/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-152.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-98-152</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-152</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-98-152; B-2 Bomber: Additional Costs to Correct Deficiencies and Make Improvements;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Weapons systems</topic>
 <topic>Air Force procurement</topic>
 <topic>Bomber aircraft</topic>
 <topic>Defense capabilities</topic>
 <topic>Future budget projections</topic>
 <topic>Concurrency</topic>
 <topic>Military cost control</topic>
 <topic>B-2A Aircraft</topic>
 <topic>B-1B Aircraft</topic>
</subject>
</mods>