<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18037f2d6">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-05-22</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>37 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-98-147</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-147</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18037f2d6</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns98147</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-147</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-147</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-98-147</reportNumber>
 <subject>Satellites</subject>
 <subject>Aerospace contracts</subject>
 <subject>Prime contractors</subject>
 <subject>Contractor performance</subject>
 <subject>Life cycle costs</subject>
 <subject>Cost overruns</subject>
 <subject>Aerospace research</subject>
 <subject>Budgetary reserves</subject>
 <subject>Cost analysis</subject>
 <identifier>NASA International Space Station Alpha Program</identifier>
 <type>Other Written Product</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
 <congReport congress="105" number="297" type="CONF"></congReport>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>International Space Station: U.S. Life-Cycle Funding Requirements</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed issues associated with
the National Aeronautics and Space Administration&apos;s (NASA) International
Space Station program, focusing on: (1) estimates of the station&apos;s
development, assembly, and operations costs and comparing this estimate
with the estimate in GAO&apos;s June 1995 report; (2) program uncertainties
that may affect those costs; (3) potential debris tracking costs; (4)
the status of program reserves; and (5) recent actions to measure prime
contractor performance based on rebaselined information.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) life-cycle cost is the sum total of direct,
indirect, recurring, and nonrecurring cost of a system over its entire
life through disposal; (2) overall, the estimated U.S. cost to develop,
assemble, and operate the space station is about $96 billion, an
increase of almost $2 billion over GAO&apos;s last estimate made in 1995; (3)
development costs represent the largest increase--more than 20 percent;
(4) the development increase is attributable to schedule slippages,
prime contract growth, additional crew return vehicle costs, and the
effects of delays in delivery of the Russian-made Service Module; (5)
overall costs would have been significantly higher had there not been an
offsetting reduction in shuttle support costs; (6) a number of potential
program changes could significantly increase the updated cost estimate;
(7) they include the potential or additional schedule slippage and the
need for shuttle launches to test and deliver the crew return vehicle;
(8) at the current estimated spending rate, the program would incur
additional costs of more than $100 million for every month of schedule
slippage; (9) in addition, NASA may have to incur costs related to
protecting the station from space debris; (10) in August 1997, the
agency updated its overall space debris tracking requirement; (11) the
new requirement, as it relates to supporting the space station, includes
the ability to track and catalog objects as small as 1 centimeter; (12)
the adequacy of the space station program&apos;s funding reserves has been a
concern of GAO&apos;s; (13) the program has used, or identified potential
uses for, a significant portion of its available reserves, with almost 6
years left before the last assembly flight is scheduled to be launched;
(14) in October 1997, NASA granted approval to Boeing Corporation to
begin tracking cost and schedule performance using a new performance
measurement baseline; (15) the purpose of the change was to incorporate
updated program schedules to reflect the most achievable recovery plans;
(16) for reporting purposes, the change had the effect of resetting cost
and schedule variances to zero; (17) the original baseline shows that
the February 1998 cost variance would have been about $50 million higher
than the $398 million Boeing reported prior to the change; and (18)
while NASA approved the new baseline for reporting purposes, it
continues to use Boeing&apos;s estimate of overrun at completion--$600
million--as the basis for calculating the contractor&apos;s incentive award
fee.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-147/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-147.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-147/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-147.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-98-147</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-147</url>
</location>
<note>Other Written Product</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-98-147; International Space Station: U.S. Life-Cycle Funding Requirements;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Satellites</topic>
 <topic>Aerospace contracts</topic>
 <topic>Prime contractors</topic>
 <topic>Contractor performance</topic>
 <topic>Life cycle costs</topic>
 <topic>Cost overruns</topic>
 <topic>Aerospace research</topic>
 <topic>Budgetary reserves</topic>
 <topic>Cost analysis</topic>
 <topic>NASA International Space Station Alpha Program</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Conference Report 297 (105th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="congressional report citation">Conf. Rept. 105-297</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>