<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18039ae96">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-06-26</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>19 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-98-146</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-146</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18039ae96</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns98146</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-146</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-146</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-98-146</reportNumber>
 <subject>Air Force procurement</subject>
 <subject>Revenue sharing</subject>
 <subject>Marketing</subject>
 <subject>Litigation</subject>
 <subject>Sales contracts</subject>
 <subject>Post exchanges</subject>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
 <USCode title="10">
                      <section number="2487"></section>
                </USCode>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Defense Commissaries: Issues Related to the Sale of Electronic Scanner Data</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Defense Commissary
Agency&apos;s (DeCA) sale of scanner data and its implementation of category
management, focusing on DeCA&apos;s: (1) total revenue from selling scanner
data and the comparison of license revenues to amounts offered by firms
responding to the June 1995 solicitation; (2) implementation of category
management as it relates to requirements contained in the 1995
solicitation; and (3) future plans regarding category management,
scanner data sales, and potential development of an in-house market
analysis capability.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) DeCA collected almost $6.1 million from the sale of
its scanner data from January 1991 through March 1998; (2) about $4
million, or 65 percent of the total, was collected from the Air Force
contract awarded in 1989; (3) the remaining 35 percent, almost $2.1
million, came from the license agreements; (4) DeCA received slightly
over $1 million annually from these licenses--an amount significantly
less than the minimum proceeds guaranteed by two offerors under the 1995
solicitation; (5) the selected firm offered a 5-year annual average
minimum payment of almost $2.5 million; (6) DeCA officials cited several
reasons for the lower amount received from the license agreements,
including the interim, nonexclusive nature of the sale and uncertainties
regarding the litigation; (7) according to a DeCA official, a new spot
bid sale of DeCA&apos;s scanner data had been planned before the Court of
Appeals&apos; May 19, 1998, ruling, and increased revenue had been expected
from this effort; (8) since 1994, DeCA has been implementing the
category management concept and techniques into its operations; (9)
according to DeCA officials, the type and level of category management
assistance contained in the 1995 solicitation is no longer necessary;
(10) DeCA reorganized its buying function in mid-1994 to model the type
of organization required to support the category management concept;
(11) subsequently, it implemented a category management planning
process; trained personnel; established product categories and completed
many category plans; and began efforts to improve or replace data
information and collection systems, including acquiring new store
scanners; (12) according to DeCA officials, existing category management
capabilities need refinement, but the capabilities envisioned in the
solicitation are no longer appropriate, resulting in the decision to
cancel the requirement for category management services; (13) with
resolution of the litigation associated with the 1995 solicitation, DeCA
still plans to continue licensing its raw scanner data to multiple
buyers and further refine its category management system; and (14)
officials stated that DeCA has no plan or desire to develop an in-house
market analysis capability for the purpose of selling refined DeCA
scanner data products to vendors and suppliers.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-146/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-146.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-146/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-146.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-98-146</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-146</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-98-146; Defense Commissaries: Issues Related to the Sale of Electronic Scanner Data;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Air Force procurement</topic>
 <topic>Revenue sharing</topic>
 <topic>Marketing</topic>
 <topic>Litigation</topic>
 <topic>Sales contracts</topic>
 <topic>Post exchanges</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 10 Section 2487</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">10 U.S.C. 2487</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>