<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18037aed1">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997-10-10</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>27 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-98-14</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-14</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18037aed1</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns98014</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-14</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-14</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-98-14</reportNumber>
 <subject>Management information systems</subject>
 <subject>Logistics</subject>
 <subject>Military inventories</subject>
 <subject>Spare parts</subject>
 <subject>Weapons systems</subject>
 <subject>Army supplies</subject>
 <subject>Military budgets</subject>
 <subject>Inventory control systems</subject>
 <subject>Equipment maintenance</subject>
 <identifier>Army Modification Work Order Program</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Army Equipment: Management of Weapon System and Equipment Modification Program Needs Improvement</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on the
Army&apos;s management of its modification work order (MWO) program, focusing
on: (1) the availability of information needed by Army headquarters and
field personnel to effectively oversee and manage the MWO program; (2)
the availability of spare parts needed by personnel in the field to
maintain modified equipment; and (3) field personnel&apos;s experiences in
implementing the MWO program.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) Army headquarters officials and Army Materiel
Command officials no longer have the information they need to
effectively oversee and manage the MWO program; (2) this occurred
because the centralized database to track installation and funding was
discontinued; control over modification installation funding was
transferred from the headquarters level to individual program sponsors;
and the authority over configuration control boards, which ensured the
completeness and compliance of MWOs with policy, was transferred to
individual program sponsors; (3) as a result, Army officials do not have
an adequate overview of the status of equipment modifications across the
force, funding requirements, logistical support requirements, and
information needed for deployment decisions; (4) the lack of information
is also a problem at field units; (5) maintenance personnel have not
always known which modifications should have been made to equipment or
which modifications have actually been made; (6) in addition,
maintainers of equipment have not always received the technical
information they need in a timely manner to properly maintain modified
equipment; (7) maintenance personnel in the field have had difficulty
obtaining spare parts to maintain modified equipment because program
sponsors frequently had not ordered initial spare parts when they
acquired modification kits; (8) Army officials believe these problems
occurred because they lost oversight and control of the program and
policies and procedures were not being consistently applied by the
individual program sponsors; (9) because spare parts have often not been
available, maintenance personnel have made additional efforts to
maintain modified equipment; (10) supply system personnel have not
always followed policies and procedures to ensure that supply system
records were updated to show the addition of new spare parts and the
deletion of replaced spare parts; (11) as a result, the Army&apos;s budget
for spare parts may not reflect accurate requirements for new components
to repair and maintain modified weapon systems and equipment; (12)
maintenance personnel in the field have also experienced a variety of
problems in implementing MWOs; (13) maintainers have not always received
adequate notice of pending modifications, and training schedules and
equipment maintenance have been adversely affected; (14) GAO was told
that various items of equipment did not always work together once some
modifications were made; and (15) according to Army officials, these
problems also occurred because of their loss of oversight and control.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-14/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-14.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-14/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-14.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-98-14</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-98-14</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-98-14; Army Equipment: Management of Weapon System and Equipment Modification Program Needs Improvement;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Management information systems</topic>
 <topic>Logistics</topic>
 <topic>Military inventories</topic>
 <topic>Spare parts</topic>
 <topic>Weapons systems</topic>
 <topic>Army supplies</topic>
 <topic>Military budgets</topic>
 <topic>Inventory control systems</topic>
 <topic>Equipment maintenance</topic>
 <topic>Army Modification Work Order Program</topic>
</subject>
</mods>