<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18039d3e6">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997-04-21</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>25 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-97-96</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-96</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18039d3e6</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns97096</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-96</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-96</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-97-96</reportNumber>
 <subject>Air Force bases</subject>
 <subject>Military airlift operations</subject>
 <subject>Foreign governments</subject>
 <subject>International relations</subject>
 <subject>Base closures</subject>
 <subject>Base realignments</subject>
 <subject>Defense contingency planning</subject>
 <subject>Military downsizing</subject>
 <subject>Military cost control</subject>
 <subject>International agreements</subject>
 <identifier>Madrid (Spain)</identifier>
 <identifier>Desert Shield</identifier>
 <identifier>Desert Storm</identifier>
 <identifier>DOD En Route Basing System</identifier>
 <identifier>Spain</identifier>
 <identifier>Italy</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Military Airlift: Savings Achievable by Eliminating Support Operations at Torrejon Air Base, Spain</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>GAO reviewed: (1) the future use of Torrejon Air Base in Spain for
airlift operations; (2) the cost savings that would be realized if the
Air Mobility Command&apos;s presence at that base was ended; and (3)
alternatives the Air Mobility Command is considering to the current use
of Torrejon Air Base.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) the future use of Torrejon Air Base by the Air
Mobility Command is questionable; (2) Department of Defense, State
Department, and U.S. Embassy officials acknowledge that the government
of Spain does not want the Command to use Torrejon Air Base to support
future airlift missions; (3) the Spanish government suggested that the
Command relocate its personnel stationed at Torrejon to another base in
Spain; (4) although the Command did not relocate its civilian and
military personnel, in July 1996 the U.S. Transportation Command
terminated a planned fuel system upgrade at the base for which it had
already spent $800,000 and reprogrammed the remaining $2.5 million for
other needs; (5) discontinuing operations at Torrejon and eliminating
both civilian and military positions would result in an annual savings
of $515,000; (6) the Air Mobility Command could also save about $200,000
annually in operations and maintenance costs by discontinuing its
operations at Torrejon and eliminating its civilian positions; (7) these
savings would continue to accrue, at a minimum, until an alternative
location is selected to fill the capacity viewed as lost by
discontinuing operations at Torrejon; (8) the Command could save an
additional $315,000 in military personnel costs if it eliminated the
military positions from the force structure; (9) the Command has
short-term alternatives to the use of Torrejon; (10) these alternatives
include relying on the four key European bases (Mildenhall Air Base,
England, Moron Air Base, Spain, and Rhein Main and Ramstein Air Bases,
Germany) to the maximum extent possible and using other locations, as
necessary; (11) additionally, the Command, in conjunction with officials
from the U.S. Transportation Command and U.S. Air Forces, Europe, is
considering three long-term alternatives to make the en route system
capable of carrying out its peacetime and wartime missions and replace
the capability provided by Torrejon; (12) these alternatives include
adding limited capability to Rota Naval Air Station and reopening and
enhancing Zaragoza Air Base, Spain, significantly enhancing Rota Naval
Air Station, Spain, and adding limited capability to Fairford Air Base,
England, and reopening and enhancing Zaragoza and adding limited
capability to Fairford; (13) however, the Spanish government, which has
final approval over all activities at the bases in Spain, delayed the a*</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-96/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-96.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-96/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-96.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-97-96</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-96</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-97-96; Military Airlift: Savings Achievable by Eliminating Support Operations at Torrejon Air Base, Spain;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Air Force bases</topic>
 <topic>Military airlift operations</topic>
 <topic>Foreign governments</topic>
 <topic>International relations</topic>
 <topic>Base closures</topic>
 <topic>Base realignments</topic>
 <topic>Defense contingency planning</topic>
 <topic>Military downsizing</topic>
 <topic>Military cost control</topic>
 <topic>International agreements</topic>
 <topic>Madrid (Spain)</topic>
 <topic>Desert Shield</topic>
 <topic>Desert Storm</topic>
 <topic>DOD En Route Basing System</topic>
 <topic>Spain</topic>
 <topic>Italy</topic>
</subject>
</mods>