<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180378164">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997-04-18</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>67 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-97-90</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-90</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180378164</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns97090</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-23</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-90</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-90</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-97-90</reportNumber>
 <subject>Human resources utilization</subject>
 <subject>Military cost control</subject>
 <subject>Military downsizing</subject>
 <subject>Personnel management</subject>
 <subject>Military officers</subject>
 <subject>Projections</subject>
 <subject>Reductions in force</subject>
 <subject>Naval personnel</subject>
 <subject>Enlisted personnel</subject>
 <identifier>DOD Bottom-Up Review</identifier>
 <identifier>Navy Shore Requirements, Standards, and Manpower Planning</identifier>
 <identifier>System</identifier>
 <identifier>Navy Manpower Engineering Program</identifier>
 <identifier>Navy Total Force Manpower Management System</identifier>
 <identifier>DOD Future Years Defense Program</identifier>
 <type>Chapter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Force Structure: Streamlining Plans Could Enable Navy to Reduce Personnel Below FY 1999 Goal</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>GAO reviewed the: (1) size and composition of Navy active duty forces
between 1989 and 1999; (2) Navy&apos;s plans to achieve its fiscal year (FY)
1999 active duty force goal and initiatives that could further reduce
forces beyond the planned FY 1999 level; and (3) Navy&apos;s processes for
determining active military force requirements.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) the Navy plans to reduce its active military forces
from 592,652 in FY 1989 to 394,900 in FY 1999; (2) by the end of FY
1999, infrastructure-related positions will have been reduced at a
slightly greater rate than mission-related positions; (3) during the
drawdown, the Navy plans to reduce the number of enlisted personnel at a
higher rate than officers and the number of junior officers and enlisted
personnel at higher rates than senior personnel; (4) while officers and
enlisted personnel in mission-related positions will decline by nearly
the same percentage, enlisted personnel will decline by a greater
percentage than officers in infrastructure positions; (5) as a result,
the proportion of officers in infrastructure positions will increase
from about 17 percent in FY 1989 to 21 percent in FY 1999; (6) the
effect is that costs will not decline in proportion to personnel; (7) as
of September 30, 1996, the Navy had reduced its active military
personnel by 164,700 primarily by decommissioning ships, submarines, and
aircraft squadrons and closing shore-based activities; (8) the Navy will
need to reduce its forces by another 33,100 to reach its end strength
goal by continuing to close bases, decommission ships, submarines, and
aircraft squadrons, plus reducing recruiting and associated training and
outsourcing some functions; (9) for 25 years, the Navy has not properly
assessed personnel requirements for its shore-based activities primarily
because of the low priority that the Navy traditionally gave to managing
the shore establishment, ineffective Navy management and oversight of
the shore requirements program, and changes in program direction; (10)
the Navy is instituting several measures to strengthen the shore
requirements program; (11) however, without continued high-level Navy
support and long-term commitment, there is no guarantee that the fate of
these proposals will be any different than those of earlier years; (12)
the Navy has little assurance that resources are being used efficiently
and that its shore establishment is appropriately sized without an
effective long-term program for determining personnel requirements; (13)
accordingly, GAO believes this represents a material weakness in the
Navy that should be reported under the Federal Managers&apos; Financial
Integrity Act (FMFIA); and (14) GAO believes improving the requirements
process is particularly important as the Navy looks for savings and eff*</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-90/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-90.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-90/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-90.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-97-90</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-90</url>
</location>
<note>Chapter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-97-90; Force Structure: Streamlining Plans Could Enable Navy to Reduce Personnel Below FY 1999 Goal;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Human resources utilization</topic>
 <topic>Military cost control</topic>
 <topic>Military downsizing</topic>
 <topic>Personnel management</topic>
 <topic>Military officers</topic>
 <topic>Projections</topic>
 <topic>Reductions in force</topic>
 <topic>Naval personnel</topic>
 <topic>Enlisted personnel</topic>
 <topic>DOD Bottom-Up Review</topic>
 <topic>Navy Shore Requirements, Standards, and Manpower Planning</topic>
 <topic>System</topic>
 <topic>Navy Manpower Engineering Program</topic>
 <topic>Navy Total Force Manpower Management System</topic>
 <topic>DOD Future Years Defense Program</topic>
</subject>
</mods>