<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18039d585">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997-03-24</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>22 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-97-89</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-89</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18039d585</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns97089</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-23</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-89</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-89</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-97-89</reportNumber>
 <subject>Armed forces reserves</subject>
 <subject>Federal service academies</subject>
 <subject>Military officers</subject>
 <subject>Military training</subject>
 <subject>Military recruiting</subject>
 <subject>Human resources utilization</subject>
 <subject>Cost effectiveness analysis</subject>
 <subject>Education or training costs</subject>
 <identifier>Reserve Officer Training Corps Program</identifier>
 <identifier>Army Individual Mobilization Augmentee Program</identifier>
 <identifier>Army Voluntary Early Release/Retirement Program</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
 <law congress="102" isPrivate="false" number="484"></law>
 <law congress="104" isPrivate="false" number="201"></law>
 <USCode title="10">
                      <section detail="(d)" number="12301"></section>
                </USCode>
 <USCode title="32">
                      <section detail="(f)" number="502"></section>
                </USCode>
 <statuteAtLarge volume="106">
                      <pages pages="2315"></pages>
                </statuteAtLarge>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>DOD Service Academies: Problems Limit Feasibility of Graduates Directly Entering the Reserves</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a legislative requirement, GAO reviewed the policy and cost
implications of up to 5 percent of each military service academy&apos;s
graduating class serving in the reserve with a corresponding increase in
the number of Reserve Officers Training Corps (ROTC) graduates serving
on active duty, focusing on: (1) the number of academy graduates serving
in an active status in the reserve component; (2) the feasibility and
implications of a proposal to have academy graduates serve in a drilling
status in the reserve component without having served on active duty as
a means of enhancing the capability of the guard/reserves; and (3) other
means through which the reserve components are recruiting junior
officers.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) as of October 1, 1996, 5,014 service academy
graduates were serving in the active reserve components; (2)
additionally, 424 academy graduates were on active duty with a reserve
component performing full-time Active Guard/Reserve support functions
under the authority of 10 U.S.C. 12301(d) and 32 U.S.C. 502(f); (3)
about 4.6 percent of the officers in the drilling guard/reserves were
academy graduates compared to 17.4 percent of the active forces; (4)
Department of Defense (DOD), service, and academy officials, with the
exception of those representing the National Guard, believe that sending
academy graduates to the drilling guard/reserves upon graduation would
be counterproductive; (5) they pointed to the need for new officers,
regardless of their commissioning source, to receive skill training and
experience before they can be productive guard/reserve members; (6)
since the academies are the most expensive source of new officers,
concerns were expressed that sending academy graduates to the reserves
before they complete their active duty obligation would not produce a
sufficient payback for the cost of their education; (7) DOD officials
additionally cited a number of administrative and practical problems
that would require policy changes at the academies and the selected
reserves; (8) National Guard officials, however, noted that they have
vacancies for officers in the junior officer grades and believe that the
assignment of academy graduates directly to the National Guard would be
feasible; (9) based on their experiences with programs for new ROTC
graduate accessions, National Guard officials believe that the policy
and administrative difficulties in accessing academy graduates could be
managed; (10) the reserve components presently receive academy graduates
through normal attrition as academy-produced officers join the drilling
guard/reserves after completing their obligated active duty service;
(11) in addition, efforts to downsize the active duty force have had a
side benefit of enhancing the capability of the reserve component by
getting more trained and experienced officers into active reserve
status; (12) recently, these early release programs have been opened to
graduates from the academies and the ROTC; and (13) since 1994, the Army
National Guard Combat Readiness Reform Act of 1992 has allowed the Army
to bring in 482 academy graduates and 108 graduates from the ROTC with *</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-89/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-89.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-89/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-89.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-97-89</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-89</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-97-89; DOD Service Academies: Problems Limit Feasibility of Graduates Directly Entering the Reserves;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Armed forces reserves</topic>
 <topic>Federal service academies</topic>
 <topic>Military officers</topic>
 <topic>Military training</topic>
 <topic>Military recruiting</topic>
 <topic>Human resources utilization</topic>
 <topic>Cost effectiveness analysis</topic>
 <topic>Education or training costs</topic>
 <topic>Reserve Officer Training Corps Program</topic>
 <topic>Army Individual Mobilization Augmentee Program</topic>
 <topic>Army Voluntary Early Release/Retirement Program</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 10 Section 12301(d)</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">10 U.S.C. 12301(d)</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 32 Section 502(f)</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">32 U.S.C. 502(f)</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Statutes at Large</title>
  <partNumber>Volume 106 Page 2315</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="Statute citation">106 Stat. 2315</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 484 (102nd Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 102-484</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 201 (104th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 104-201</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>