<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee1803793e2">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1996-12-31</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>48 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-97-51</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-51</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee1803793e2</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns97051</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-51</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-51</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-97-51</reportNumber>
 <subject>Political refugees</subject>
 <subject>International relations</subject>
 <subject>International organizations</subject>
 <subject>Foreign governments</subject>
 <subject>Immigration or emigration</subject>
 <subject>Eligibility criteria</subject>
 <subject>Eligibility determinations</subject>
 <subject>Embassies</subject>
 <identifier>UNHCR Comprehensive Plan of Action</identifier>
 <identifier>Indonesia</identifier>
 <identifier>Philippines</identifier>
 <identifier>Malaysia</identifier>
 <identifier>Hong Kong</identifier>
 <identifier>Dept. of State Orderly Departure Program</identifier>
 <identifier>Vietnam</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Vietnamese Asylum Seekers: A Review of Selected Cases in Four Southeast Asia Countries</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed how the refugee status
determination process worked for a selected number of Vietnamese asylum
seekers in Southeast Asia, focusing on: (1) the international refugee
criteria used under the Comprehensive Plan of Action; and (2) how the
screening process was implemented.&lt;p/&gt;GAO found that: (1) beginning in late 1994, the U.N. High Commissioner
for Refugees (UNHCR) undertook a regionwide review of screened-out cases
to determine whether asylum seekers would qualify for resettlement
according to established family unity criteria; (2) UNHCR reviewed
hundreds of cases, but found most failed to meet the program criteria;
(3) UNHCR identified a small number of cases in Indonesia, Malaysia, and
the Philippines that met the criteria prior to UNHCR mandating the
asylum seekers as refugees; (4) among these were 72 cases that were
forwarded to U.S. embassies for consideration for resettlement; (5)
while the United States initially accepted 23 of 36 cases for
resettlement in Malaysia, it refused to review 36 similar cases from
Indonesia and the Philippines; (6) the U.S. embassies in the latter two
countries refused to review any case that was not first mandated by
UNHCR, on the other hand, UNHCR would not issue a mandate without some
assurance from the resettlement countries that cases would be approved;
(7) this impasse was never resolved and those asylum seekers identified
by UNHCR were not reunited with family members in the United States
through this process; (8) victim of violence cases involved individuals
who were physically assaulted on the way to, or upon arriving in, one of
the first asylum countries; (9) according to UNHCR officials, because of
the trauma and abuse the individuals suffered, many were unable to
articulate their claim for refugee status; (10) to avoid subjecting
vulnerable persons to the rigors of the regular screening process, UNHCR
established special procedures to determine a durable solution in the
&quot;best interest&quot; of these individuals; (11) depending on where the best
support structure existed, individuals could be returned to Vietnam to
live with family or resettled in a third country; (12) of the 74 merit
cases GAO reviewed, it appears that most did not present strong refugee
claims based on evidence contained in the files; (13) many case files
were well-documented and presented detailed facts and logical
explanations for decisions that were made, while others contained
documents that pointed to differences and inconsistencies in the way
claims may have been handled; and (14) as a result, in some cases, GAO
could not determine how well the case files reflected the presentation
of the asylum seekers&apos; claims.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-51/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-51.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-51/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-51.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-97-51</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-51</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-97-51; Vietnamese Asylum Seekers: A Review of Selected Cases in Four Southeast Asia Countries;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Political refugees</topic>
 <topic>International relations</topic>
 <topic>International organizations</topic>
 <topic>Foreign governments</topic>
 <topic>Immigration or emigration</topic>
 <topic>Eligibility criteria</topic>
 <topic>Eligibility determinations</topic>
 <topic>Embassies</topic>
 <topic>UNHCR Comprehensive Plan of Action</topic>
 <topic>Indonesia</topic>
 <topic>Philippines</topic>
 <topic>Malaysia</topic>
 <topic>Hong Kong</topic>
 <topic>Dept. of State Orderly Departure Program</topic>
 <topic>Vietnam</topic>
</subject>
</mods>