<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180395431">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997-02-13</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>30 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-97-23</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-23</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180395431</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns97023</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-23</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-23</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-97-23</reportNumber>
 <subject>Defense procurement</subject>
 <subject>Advanced weapons systems</subject>
 <subject>Budget cuts</subject>
 <subject>Testing</subject>
 <subject>Federal procurement policies</subject>
 <subject>Defense budgets</subject>
 <subject>Defense cost control</subject>
 <subject>Defense capabilities</subject>
 <subject>Concurrency</subject>
 <subject>Irregular procurement practices</subject>
 <identifier>C-17 Aircraft</identifier>
 <identifier>T-45A Aircraft</identifier>
 <identifier>Army Family of Medium Tactical Vehicles</identifier>
 <identifier>HAWKEYE E-2C Aircraft</identifier>
 <identifier>Avenger Aircraft</identifier>
 <identifier>Blackhawk Helicopter</identifier>
 <identifier>Tomahawk Cruise Missile</identifier>
 <identifier>NAVSTAR Global Positioning System</identifier>
 <identifier>Kiowa Warrior Helicopter</identifier>
 <identifier>HELLFIRE Missile</identifier>
 <identifier>Standard Missile System</identifier>
 <identifier>F-22 Aircraft</identifier>
 <identifier>JSTARS Common Ground Station</identifier>
 <identifier>Multiple Launch Rocket System</identifier>
 <identifier>Rolling Airframe Missile</identifier>
 <identifier>F/A-18E/F Aircraft</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
 <law congress="104" isPrivate="false" number="201"></law>
 <USCode title="10">
                      <section number="2400"></section>
                </USCode>
 <USCode title="31">
                      <section number="720"></section>
                </USCode>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Weapons Acquisition: Better Use of Limited DOD Acquisition Funding Would Reduce Costs</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>GAO reviewed the Department of Defense&apos;s (DOD) weapons acquisition
procedures, focusing on: (1) DOD&apos;s practice of reducing the annual
production of weapons below planned optimum rates during full-rate
production; (2) the reasons for this practice; and (3) the effect of
this practice on the costs and availability of weapons.&lt;p/&gt;GAO found that: (1) DOD has inappropriately placed a high priority on
buying large numbers of untested weapons during low-rate initial
production to ensure commitment to new programs and thus has had to cut
by more than half its planned full production rates for many weapons
that have already been tested; (2) this practice is wasteful because DOD
must often modify, at high cost, the large numbers of untested weapons
it has bought before they are usable and must lower annual buys of
tested, proven weapons, stretching out full-rate production for years
due to a lack of funds; (3) GAO has repeatedly reported on DOD&apos;s
practice of procuring substantial inventories of unsatisfactory weapons
requiring costly modifications to achieve satisfactory performance and,
in some cases, deployment of substandard weapons to combat forces; (4)
GAO found the practice of reducing planned full production rates to be
widespread; (5) primarily because of funding limitations, DOD has
reduced the annual full-rate production for 17 of the 22 proven weapons
reviewed, stretching out the completion of the weapons&apos; production an
average of 8 years longer than planned; (6) according to DOD&apos;s records,
if these weapons were produced at their originally planned rates and
respective cost estimates, the quantities produced as of the end of
fiscal year 1996 would have cost nearly $10 billion less; (7) at the
same time, DOD is funding increased annual quantities of weapons in
low-rate production that often are in excess of what is needed to
perform operational tests and establish the production base; (8) if DOD
bought untested weapons during low-rate initial production at minimum
rates, more funds would be available to buy other proven weapons in
full-rate production at more efficient rates and at lower costs; and (9)
this would reduce costly modifications to fix substandard weapons bought
in low-rate production and allow full-rate production of weapons with
demonstrated performance to be completed and deployed to combat forces
earlier.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-23/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-23.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-23/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-23.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-97-23</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-23</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-97-23; Weapons Acquisition: Better Use of Limited DOD Acquisition Funding Would Reduce Costs;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Defense procurement</topic>
 <topic>Advanced weapons systems</topic>
 <topic>Budget cuts</topic>
 <topic>Testing</topic>
 <topic>Federal procurement policies</topic>
 <topic>Defense budgets</topic>
 <topic>Defense cost control</topic>
 <topic>Defense capabilities</topic>
 <topic>Concurrency</topic>
 <topic>Irregular procurement practices</topic>
 <topic>C-17 Aircraft</topic>
 <topic>T-45A Aircraft</topic>
 <topic>Army Family of Medium Tactical Vehicles</topic>
 <topic>HAWKEYE E-2C Aircraft</topic>
 <topic>Avenger Aircraft</topic>
 <topic>Blackhawk Helicopter</topic>
 <topic>Tomahawk Cruise Missile</topic>
 <topic>NAVSTAR Global Positioning System</topic>
 <topic>Kiowa Warrior Helicopter</topic>
 <topic>HELLFIRE Missile</topic>
 <topic>Standard Missile System</topic>
 <topic>F-22 Aircraft</topic>
 <topic>JSTARS Common Ground Station</topic>
 <topic>Multiple Launch Rocket System</topic>
 <topic>Rolling Airframe Missile</topic>
 <topic>F/A-18E/F Aircraft</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 10 Section 2400</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">10 U.S.C. 2400</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 31 Section 720</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">31 U.S.C. 720</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 201 (104th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 104-201</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>