<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180382729">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997-08-05</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>34 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-97-219R</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-219R</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180382729</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns97219r</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-219R</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-219R</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-97-219R</reportNumber>
 <subject>Agency missions</subject>
 <subject>Strategic planning</subject>
 <subject>Program evaluation</subject>
 <subject>Financial management systems</subject>
 <subject>Public administration</subject>
 <subject>Inventory control systems</subject>
 <subject>Internal controls</subject>
 <subject>Information resources management</subject>
 <subject>Interagency relations</subject>
 <subject>Congressional/executive relations</subject>
 <identifier>DOD Strategic Logistics Plan</identifier>
 <identifier>DOD Quadrennial Defense Review</identifier>
 <type>Correspondence</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
 <USCode title="10">
                      <section number="113"></section>
                </USCode>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>The Results Act: Observations on DOD&apos;s Draft Strategic Plan</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the draft strategic
plan submitted by the Department of Defense (DOD) as required by the
Government Performance and Results Act.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) DOD&apos;s draft plan includes discussions of each of the
six critical components required in strategic plans; (2) overall, while
some of the plan&apos;s components are of higher quality than others, the
plan represents an adequate start for addressing the requirements of the
Results Act; (3) the draft plan contains a succinct mission statement
and general goals and objectives that cover DOD&apos;s major functions and
operations; (4) however, the overall plan could be improved by
clarifying sections, adding information, and improving the plan&apos;s
format; (5) the plan&apos;s overall quality could be enhanced by: (a) stating
more completely and explicitly its strategies for achieving each goal
and including schedules for initiating and completing significant
actions; (b) discussing more clearly how external factors link to and
could affect achieving its goals; (c) describing in more detail the
program evaluations used in establishing its strategic goals and
identifying the key issues to be addressed in future evaluations; (d)
addressing what DOD has done or plans to do to resolve its persistent
management problems, including specific steps it plans to take, the time
frames and resources needed to implement its plans, and identification
of any external factors that could impede resolution; (e) beginning now
to work closely with Congress and other stakeholders in developing
performance goals and measures; (f) identifying programs and activities
that crosscut with other agencies&apos; programs and discussing how those
efforts are being coordinated; and (g) developing one clear and succinct
document primarily based on the Quadrennial Defense Review and formatted
to correspond with the Results Act&apos;s requirements and the other
expectations for Results Act plans; (6) DOD&apos;s plan included some
discussion of formidable management problems DOD currently faces; (7)
these problems are important because they could affect DOD&apos;s ability to
meet its strategic goals and objectives; (8) however, DOD&apos;s discussions
of management problems could be more complete; (9) the significant
problems DOD faces with managing its contract operations were not
discussed; and (10) DOD&apos;s major concern about the reliability of
program-related and financial management information systems does not
mention how data limitations would affect its ability to measure
performance and ultimately to effectively manage its programs.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-219R/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-219R.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-219R/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-219R.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-97-219R</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-219R</url>
</location>
<note>Correspondence</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-97-219R; The Results Act: Observations on DOD&apos;s Draft Strategic Plan;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Agency missions</topic>
 <topic>Strategic planning</topic>
 <topic>Program evaluation</topic>
 <topic>Financial management systems</topic>
 <topic>Public administration</topic>
 <topic>Inventory control systems</topic>
 <topic>Internal controls</topic>
 <topic>Information resources management</topic>
 <topic>Interagency relations</topic>
 <topic>Congressional/executive relations</topic>
 <topic>DOD Strategic Logistics Plan</topic>
 <topic>DOD Quadrennial Defense Review</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 10 Section 113</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">10 U.S.C. 113</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>