<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180394436">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997-08-15</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>12 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-97-180</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-180</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180394436</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns97180</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-180</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-180</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-97-180</reportNumber>
 <subject>Public relations</subject>
 <subject>Evaluation criteria</subject>
 <subject>Historic preservation</subject>
 <subject>Military vessels</subject>
 <subject>Gifts or gratuities</subject>
 <identifier>U.S.S. Missouri</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
 <USCode title="10">
                      <section number="7306"></section>
                </USCode>
 <USCode title="31">
                      <section number="720"></section>
                </USCode>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Naval Ship Donation: Existing Procedures Inadequate for the Use of Additional Evaluation Criteria</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the facts surrounding
the donation of the U.S.S. Missouri to the U.S.S. Missouri Memorial
Association, focusing on the: (1) process of applying for the ship; (2)
evaluation criteria and weighting used to evaluate the applications; and
(3) use of the criteria and weighting in the selection process.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) the Navy began the donation process for the U.S.S.
Missouri in the same manner as prior donations, by requesting financial
and technical information from the applicants and working with
applicants to help ensure that their applications would satisfy the
Navy&apos;s financial and technical requirements; (2) subsequently, the Navy
decided that, with respect to the U.S.S. Missouri, additional evaluation
criteria, &quot;historical significance&quot; and &quot;public affairs benefits to the
Navy,&quot; were needed to assist the Secretary of the Navy in making the
donation decision among four of five applicants that met the Navy&apos;s
financial and technical requirements; (3) this was the first time such
additional criteria were used in any donation selection process; (4)
while the donation appears to have been impartially applied, and all
applicants were provided the same information on the additional criteria
at the same time, the Navy did not do a good job in communicating its
additional requirements to the applicants; (5) specifically, applicants
were not told: (a) what the relative importance of the evaluation
criteria was in the process (the added criteria actually represented 75
percent of the donation award weight); (b) what the added evaluation
criteria meant; or (c) how well already submitted applications met the
added criteria; (6) these factors were particularly important because
the Navy&apos;s evaluation teams were told to base their scoring only on the
information contained in the applications; (7) as a result, the Navy
evaluation teams found that the applications had limited information
that could be applied against the added criteria; (8) according to some
applicants, had they known that the additional criteria carried so much
weight, they would have revised their applications; (9) what appears to
have been an otherwise open process with clear communications and
frequent interaction between the Navy and the applicants for the U.S.S.
Missouri was not with respect to the additional two criteria; (10) the
Secretary of the Navy, by statute, has broad discretion in making ship
donation decisions; (11) the Navy&apos;s existing donation application
procedures are designed for assessing applicants in terms of their
financial and technical capabilities to move and sustain a vessel; and
(12) when additional criteria beyond financial and technical
requirements are used and applicants are asked to submit information to
address them, existing application procedures do not provide guidance on
how the Navy should proceed.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-180/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-180.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-180/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-180.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-97-180</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-180</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-97-180; Naval Ship Donation: Existing Procedures Inadequate for the Use of Additional Evaluation Criteria;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Public relations</topic>
 <topic>Evaluation criteria</topic>
 <topic>Historic preservation</topic>
 <topic>Military vessels</topic>
 <topic>Gifts or gratuities</topic>
 <topic>U.S.S. Missouri</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 10 Section 7306</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">10 U.S.C. 7306</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 31 Section 720</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">31 U.S.C. 720</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>