<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18037d07b">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997-07-23</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>26 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-97-169</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-169</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18037d07b</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns97169</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-169</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-169</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-97-169</reportNumber>
 <subject>Logistics</subject>
 <subject>Defense contingency planning</subject>
 <subject>Inventory control systems</subject>
 <subject>Military inventories</subject>
 <subject>Combat readiness</subject>
 <subject>Equipment maintenance</subject>
 <subject>Military facility construction</subject>
 <subject>Systems design</subject>
 <subject>Military vessels</subject>
 <subject>Military materiel</subject>
 <identifier>DOD Operation Vigilant Warrior</identifier>
 <identifier>Army Warfighter Equipment Status Report</identifier>
 <identifier>Army Large Medium-Speed Roll-On/Roll-Off Ship</identifier>
 <identifier>DOD Mobility Requirements Study</identifier>
 <identifier>Persian Gulf War</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Afloat Prepositioning: Not All Equipment Meets Army&apos;s Readiness Goal</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on the
readiness of the Army&apos;s war reserve equipment prepositioned afloat,
focusing on the: (1) extent to which the brigade set of war reserve
equipment, which is prepositioned on ships, meets the Army&apos;s readiness
goal; and (2) status of the Army&apos;s efforts to establish facilities to
maintain this brigade set of equipment and develop an information system
that accurately measures and reports the readiness condition of war
reserve equipment.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) of the unit sets considered when reporting the
readiness of the brigade set of war reserve equipment, about 25 percent
do not meet the Army&apos;s readiness goal for full mission capability; (2)
according to Army maintenance records, some equipment aboard
prepositioning ships had been reported as non-mission capable since
September 1995; (3) one factor that contributed to lower readiness rates
was that some equipment was not fully mission capable when it was
originally loaded on prepositioning ships; (4) other factors include the
deterioration of the equipment while in storage aboard ships and the
limited ability to conduct maintenance on the equipment while in
storage; (5) the Army plans to repair equipment that does not meet
readiness standards by conducting maintenance on prepositioning ships
every 30 months; (6) in addition, Army doctrine calls for logistics
support teams to perform maintenance on prepositioned war reserve
equipment when it is downloaded before a deployment; (7) further, the
Army is currently transferring equipment to prepositioning ships that
have been designed to better control the humidity of the shipboard
environment; (8) the Army has given priority to prepositioned ships in
its plans to redistribute equipment from central Europe; (9) this should
improve the readiness of those unit sets currently lacking equipment
required for meeting the Army&apos;s readiness goal; (10) Army maintenance
facilities in Charleston, South Carolina, were originally scheduled to
be completed before October 1996, in time for the facilities to be used
to conduct maintenance on the first full shipload of equipment
prepositioned afloat; (11) however, contracts for development of the
site and construction and renovation of buildings had not been
completed, and the maintenance contractor had to continue to rely on
temporary shelters and had to develop less efficient maintenance
processes; (12) according to Army and contractor officials, the use of
temporary facilities did not prevent the successful completion of the
maintenance mission; (13) basic elements of the Army&apos;s automated
inventory system for management of war reserves have been put in place,
including maintenance and readiness reporting software modules; (14) as
of July 1997, the Army was still developing and implementing its
information system; and (15) proposed improvements to the system includ*</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-169/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-169.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-169/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-169.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-97-169</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-169</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-97-169; Afloat Prepositioning: Not All Equipment Meets Army&apos;s Readiness Goal;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Logistics</topic>
 <topic>Defense contingency planning</topic>
 <topic>Inventory control systems</topic>
 <topic>Military inventories</topic>
 <topic>Combat readiness</topic>
 <topic>Equipment maintenance</topic>
 <topic>Military facility construction</topic>
 <topic>Systems design</topic>
 <topic>Military vessels</topic>
 <topic>Military materiel</topic>
 <topic>DOD Operation Vigilant Warrior</topic>
 <topic>Army Warfighter Equipment Status Report</topic>
 <topic>Army Large Medium-Speed Roll-On/Roll-Off Ship</topic>
 <topic>DOD Mobility Requirements Study</topic>
 <topic>Persian Gulf War</topic>
</subject>
</mods>