<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180387406">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997-06-04</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>32 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-97-156</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-156</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180387406</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns97156</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-23</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-156</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-156</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-97-156</reportNumber>
 <subject>Advanced weapons systems</subject>
 <subject>Air Force procurement</subject>
 <subject>Fighter aircraft</subject>
 <subject>Defense cost control</subject>
 <subject>Cost analysis</subject>
 <subject>Future budget projections</subject>
 <subject>Military budgets</subject>
 <subject>Defense capabilities</subject>
 <identifier>DOD Quadrennial Defense Review</identifier>
 <identifier>F-22 Aircraft</identifier>
 <identifier>F-16 Aircraft</identifier>
 <identifier>F-15 Aircraft</identifier>
 <identifier>F-18 Aircraft</identifier>
 <identifier>Eagle Aircraft</identifier>
 <identifier>Falcon Aircraft</identifier>
 <identifier>Hornet Aircraft</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Tactical Aircraft: Restructuring of the Air Force F-22 Fighter Program</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Air Force&apos;s
February 1997 plans to restructure the F-22 program, focusing on the:
(1) estimated cost of the restructured program and viability of cost
reduction initiatives; (2) planned timing for realization of benefits
from initiatives; and (3) criteria for approving initiation and
continuation of production.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) GAO&apos;s reviews of various weapon system acquisitions
have shown that initial program schedules and cost estimates have
historically been optimistic and have not often been achieved; (2) the
F-22 program is not an exception; (3) further, GAO believes the February
1997 restructuring plan reflects revised costs goals that may be
optimistic because: (a) the planned reductions in F-22 production unit
costs are greater than those experienced by prior fighter programs; and
(b) actions intended to reduce production costs have not been fully
defined and validated; (4) GAO&apos;s comparison of the projected reduction
in F-22 production unit costs with the historical unit costs of the
F-15, F-16, and F-18 programs indicates that the F-22 reductions exceed
those that have been achieved on these other programs; (5) also, to
achieve the overall cost avoidance projected by the Joint Estimate Team,
the unit cost of full-rate aircraft must be reduced by 54 percent from
the unit cost of the low-rate initial production (LRIP) aircraft instead
of by 27.9 percent, as projected before the program restructure; (6) an
aspect of cost reduction that has been previously reviewed and should
continue to be considered is the potential savings from reducing F-22
performance requirements; (7) Joint Estimate Team members told GAO that,
although they considered performance reductions in the study as a means
of reducing costs, and that potential reductions had been considered in
at least a dozen past reviews, no performance reductions were made as a
result of their study; (8) the cost reduction initiatives are not
planned to achieve significant net savings until F-22 full-rate
production, now planned to begin in fiscal year (FY) 2004; (9) the F-22
cost estimate developed by the Joint Estimate Team and endorsed by the
Air Force recognizes unit cost increases of 40 percent in F-22 LRIP
aircraft through FY 2003; (10) the program exit criteria that were
required before awarding each lot of LRIP aircraft and the first
full-rate production contract have been revised as part of the program
restructuring; and (11) although aircraft performance parameters are
reported in the Selected Acquisition Report and other Air Force and
Department of Defense reports, GAO believes specific aircraft
performance parameters should be included in the exit criteria for each
low-rate initial production lot to: (a) maintain visibility of aircraft*</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-156/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-156.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-156/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-156.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-97-156</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-156</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-97-156; Tactical Aircraft: Restructuring of the Air Force F-22 Fighter Program;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Advanced weapons systems</topic>
 <topic>Air Force procurement</topic>
 <topic>Fighter aircraft</topic>
 <topic>Defense cost control</topic>
 <topic>Cost analysis</topic>
 <topic>Future budget projections</topic>
 <topic>Military budgets</topic>
 <topic>Defense capabilities</topic>
 <topic>DOD Quadrennial Defense Review</topic>
 <topic>F-22 Aircraft</topic>
 <topic>F-16 Aircraft</topic>
 <topic>F-15 Aircraft</topic>
 <topic>F-18 Aircraft</topic>
 <topic>Eagle Aircraft</topic>
 <topic>Falcon Aircraft</topic>
 <topic>Hornet Aircraft</topic>
</subject>
</mods>