<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee1803780e0">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997-05-05</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>35 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-97-108</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-108</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee1803780e0</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns97108</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-108</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-108</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-97-108</reportNumber>
 <subject>Defense procurement</subject>
 <subject>Financial management systems</subject>
 <subject>Contract administration</subject>
 <subject>Defense contracts</subject>
 <subject>Contract monitoring</subject>
 <subject>Cost overruns</subject>
 <subject>Management information systems</subject>
 <subject>Reporting requirements</subject>
 <subject>Cost analysis</subject>
 <identifier>DOD Integrated Program Management Initiative</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Major Acquisitions: Significant Changes Underway in DOD&apos;s Earned Value Management Process</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>GAO provided information on the Department of Defense&apos;s (DOD) Earned
Value Management process, focusing on the: (1) problems facing the
cost/schedule control system (CS2) process; (2) progress DOD has made
with reforms; and (3) challenges DOD faces in fostering and managing
potentially significant changes.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) the core concept of the CS2 process, earned value,
is recognized as a sound way to measure progress on a major acquisition
programs; (2) over the years, however, the process has evolved to where
the needs of some of its key users are being satisfied, while others are
not; (3) because the data contained in the CS2 reports are typically up
to 2 months old, the reports do not function as an early warning system
needed by program managers; (4) moreover, the process has not fully
integrated cost, schedule, and technical data as intended; (5) DOD has
acknowledged the problems with CS2 for a decade, but reforms have
proceeded slowly mainly because responsibility for the process has
resided with the oversight organizations that have been its architects;
(6) DOD attempted to effect change in 1989 by transferring top-level
responsibility for the system from the comptroller staff to the
acquisition staff; (7) despite this transfer, little progress was made
because execution of CS2 at the field level remained within the
comptroller community; (8) nonetheless, DOD has embarked on several
reforms that could dramatically change the CS2 process; (9) recently,
DOD accepted industry&apos;s earned value management criteria as a
replacement for the government&apos;s long-standing CS2 criteria; (10) DOD
has also transferred responsibility and control over the process from
the services to the Defense Contract Management Command (DCMC), which
currently provides the on-site interface between the government program
office and the contractor; (11) another reform underway involves giving
DOD program managers latitude to tailor their contract data to the
specific needs of their program, such as the categories and the level of
detail; (12) these recent steps to reform the CS2 process have potent
implications; (13) for example, adopting the industry criteria could
result in less burdensome and more useful contractor management
information systems, but could also lessen the government&apos;s ability to
oversee defense programs; (14) in light of both the day-to-day demands
of managing the process on individual contracts and implementing recent
reforms, DCMC faces a significant challenge as it takes over stewardship
of the process; (15) service officials are concerned about how quickly
it can meet these demands, given its decline in staffing over the last
several years; and (16) ultimately, DCMC will have to ensure that the p*</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-108/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-108.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-108/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-108.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-97-108</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-97-108</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-97-108; Major Acquisitions: Significant Changes Underway in DOD&apos;s Earned Value Management Process;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Defense procurement</topic>
 <topic>Financial management systems</topic>
 <topic>Contract administration</topic>
 <topic>Defense contracts</topic>
 <topic>Contract monitoring</topic>
 <topic>Cost overruns</topic>
 <topic>Management information systems</topic>
 <topic>Reporting requirements</topic>
 <topic>Cost analysis</topic>
 <topic>DOD Integrated Program Management Initiative</topic>
</subject>
</mods>