<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180380cdd">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1996-03-15</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>20 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-96-87</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-96-87</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180380cdd</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns96087</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-96-87</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-96-87</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-96-87</reportNumber>
 <subject>Test facilities</subject>
 <subject>Testing</subject>
 <subject>Military cost control</subject>
 <subject>Military downsizing</subject>
 <subject>Base realignments</subject>
 <subject>Army bases</subject>
 <subject>Air Force bases</subject>
 <subject>Military aviation</subject>
 <subject>Aircraft research</subject>
 <subject>Federal facility relocation</subject>
 <identifier>California</identifier>
 <identifier>Alabama</identifier>
 <identifier>Arizona</identifier>
 <type>Other Written Product</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
 <law congress="104" isPrivate="false" number="106"></law>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Army Aviation Testing: Need to Reassess Consolidation Plan</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Secretary of the
Army&apos;s tentative decision to move aviation testing activities now at
Edwards Air Force Base, California, to Fort Rucker, Alabama, and retain
Yuma Proving Ground.&lt;p/&gt;GAO found that: (1) the Army failed to fully account for savings from
consolidating its aviation testing activities; (2) consolidation at Fort
Rucker and Yuma Proving Ground will result in the greatest short-term
and significant long-term savings; (3) single-site consolidation at Yuma
will result in the greatest long-term savings and an optimum testing
environment for future testing; (4) DOD and the services have not
reached consensus about how best to consolidate and downsize test
activities; (5) excess aviation testing capacity exists within the
Department of Defense and signals that consolidation is necessary to
reduce this excess; (6) the Secretary of Defense will need stronger
commitment and leadership to evaluate whether these options or other
options will serve DOD best.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-96-87/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-96-87.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-96-87/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-96-87.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-96-87</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-96-87</url>
</location>
<note>Other Written Product</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-96-87; Army Aviation Testing: Need to Reassess Consolidation Plan;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Test facilities</topic>
 <topic>Testing</topic>
 <topic>Military cost control</topic>
 <topic>Military downsizing</topic>
 <topic>Base realignments</topic>
 <topic>Army bases</topic>
 <topic>Air Force bases</topic>
 <topic>Military aviation</topic>
 <topic>Aircraft research</topic>
 <topic>Federal facility relocation</topic>
 <topic>California</topic>
 <topic>Alabama</topic>
 <topic>Arizona</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 106 (104th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 104-106</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>