<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18037d910">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1994-10-20</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>22 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-95-4</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-95-4</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18037d910</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns95004</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-95-4</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-95-4</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-95-4</reportNumber>
 <subject>Navy procurement</subject>
 <subject>Nuclear powered submarines</subject>
 <subject>Construction (process)</subject>
 <subject>Construction contracts</subject>
 <subject>Cost analysis</subject>
 <subject>Contract administration</subject>
 <subject>Shipbuilding industry</subject>
 <subject>Cost overruns</subject>
 <subject>Defense cost control</subject>
 <subject>Construction costs</subject>
 <identifier>Seawolf Attack Submarine</identifier>
 <identifier>SSN-21 Submarine</identifier>
 <identifier>NSSN Attack Submarine</identifier>
 <identifier>SSN-22 Submarine</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Navy Ships: Lessons of Prior Programs May Reduce New Attack Submarine Cost Increases and Delays</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Lessons learned from prior submarine programs, particularly the Seawolf,
could help the Navy save as much as $100 million in acquisition costs
while improving design quality and construction for the SSN, the latest
class of nuclear-power attack submarine. Specifically, the Navy may want
to (1) contract with a single shipyard to both design and build the lead
submarine, (2) delay lead ship construction until the ship&apos;s design is
substantially mature, (3) strengthen the specification development and
approval process, (4) identify critical components and supply vendors
early in the program, and (5) reduce submarine combat system development
risks. Because of the importance of applying both management and
technical lessons, GAO believes that the formal Defense Department
approved acquisition strategy should spell out specifically how the Navy
will avoid repeating the problems of earlier programs.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-95-4/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-95-4.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-95-4/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-95-4.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-95-4</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-95-4</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-95-4; Navy Ships: Lessons of Prior Programs May Reduce New Attack Submarine Cost Increases and Delays;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Navy procurement</topic>
 <topic>Nuclear powered submarines</topic>
 <topic>Construction (process)</topic>
 <topic>Construction contracts</topic>
 <topic>Cost analysis</topic>
 <topic>Contract administration</topic>
 <topic>Shipbuilding industry</topic>
 <topic>Cost overruns</topic>
 <topic>Defense cost control</topic>
 <topic>Construction costs</topic>
 <topic>Seawolf Attack Submarine</topic>
 <topic>SSN-21 Submarine</topic>
 <topic>NSSN Attack Submarine</topic>
 <topic>SSN-22 Submarine</topic>
</subject>
</mods>