<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18037c103">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1994-12-28</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>25 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-95-36</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-95-36</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18037c103</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns95036</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-95-36</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-95-36</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-95-36</reportNumber>
 <subject>Military inventories</subject>
 <subject>Combat readiness</subject>
 <subject>Cost effectiveness analysis</subject>
 <subject>Defense contingency planning</subject>
 <subject>Property and supply management</subject>
 <subject>Spare parts</subject>
 <subject>Inventory control systems</subject>
 <subject>Army supplies</subject>
 <subject>Logistics</subject>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Army Inventory: Reparable Exchange Items at Divisions Can Be Reduced</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Many of the reparable exchange items repaired and stocked at Army
installations are also stocked at the divisions.  If the four divisions
in GAO&apos;s review relied on inventories at the installations as their main
supply source for reparable exchange items, they could reduce their
inventory investment by nearly $47 million.  Because of the close
proximity of the divisions and their respective installation support
activities, supply responsiveness would not suffer.  Army officials were
concerned that if the divisions eliminated reparable items from their
inventories, the divisions would not have all of their authorized
inventory items if they had to deploy.  However, GAO found that in 93
percent of the cases there was more than enough inventory at the
installation and wholesale level depots to meet the divisions&apos;
authorized inventory, without retaining the added inventory of such
items at the division level.  Officials were also concerned about
situations in which units were at training locations away from the
installation and needed a reparable exchange item.  GAO suggests that
this problem could be overcome by allowing the units to keep a minimum
number of readiness-related reparable exchange items at the division
level.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-95-36/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-95-36.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-95-36/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-95-36.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-95-36</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-95-36</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-95-36; Army Inventory: Reparable Exchange Items at Divisions Can Be Reduced;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Military inventories</topic>
 <topic>Combat readiness</topic>
 <topic>Cost effectiveness analysis</topic>
 <topic>Defense contingency planning</topic>
 <topic>Property and supply management</topic>
 <topic>Spare parts</topic>
 <topic>Inventory control systems</topic>
 <topic>Army supplies</topic>
 <topic>Logistics</topic>
</subject>
</mods>