<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18038d4af">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1995-09-11</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>19 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-95-176</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-95-176</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18038d4af</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns95176</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-95-176</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-95-176</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-95-176</reportNumber>
 <subject>Military land vehicles</subject>
 <subject>Motor vehicle repairs</subject>
 <subject>Spare parts</subject>
 <subject>Military inventories</subject>
 <subject>Contract termination</subject>
 <subject>Cost effectiveness analysis</subject>
 <subject>Procurement procedures</subject>
 <subject>Air Force procurement</subject>
 <subject>Comparative analysis</subject>
 <subject>Air Force bases</subject>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Inventory Management: Purchasing Parts From Contractor-Operated Stores and Commercial Sources</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a legislative requirement, GAO compared the cost of vehicle
repair parts purchased from Air Force Contractor Operated Parts Stores
(COPARS) with those purchased directly from commercial suppliers and
provided information on whether the provisions of Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) Circular A-76 are to be applied when terminating a
COPARS contract.&lt;p/&gt;GAO found that: (1) the most cost-effective method for purchasing
vehicle repair parts varies from base to base, depending on the types of
vehicles in the fleet and the local economy, vendor availability, and
vendor delivery preferences; (2) installation commanders are in the best
position to decide which procurement approach will best meet their
needs; (3) controlling personnel costs is essential in determining
whether savings can be achieved in a commercial-source procurement
system; (4) to achieve savings, maintenance units need to perform the
purchasing function with about the same number of personnel as the
COPARS contractor and to assign personnel in mid-level enlisted pay
grades, but it is unclear whether bases can operate within such
parameters; (5) OMB Circular A-76 does not apply to the Air Force&apos;s
vehicle repair parts support decision, since the Air Force is not
replacing COPARS with in-house service; and (6) the establishment of a
commercial parts procurement system is simply an alternative way of
doing business.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-95-176/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-95-176.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-95-176/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-95-176.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-95-176</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-95-176</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-95-176; Inventory Management: Purchasing Parts From Contractor-Operated Stores and Commercial Sources;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Military land vehicles</topic>
 <topic>Motor vehicle repairs</topic>
 <topic>Spare parts</topic>
 <topic>Military inventories</topic>
 <topic>Contract termination</topic>
 <topic>Cost effectiveness analysis</topic>
 <topic>Procurement procedures</topic>
 <topic>Air Force procurement</topic>
 <topic>Comparative analysis</topic>
 <topic>Air Force bases</topic>
</subject>
</mods>