<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180376d76">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1995-03-24</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>26 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-95-101</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-95-101</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180376d76</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns95101</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-95-101</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-95-101</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-95-101</reportNumber>
 <subject>Investigations by federal agencies</subject>
 <subject>Hiring policies</subject>
 <subject>Centralization</subject>
 <subject>Federal employees</subject>
 <subject>Federal intelligence agencies</subject>
 <subject>Secret records</subject>
 <subject>Executive agencies</subject>
 <subject>Administrative costs</subject>
 <subject>Cost effectiveness analysis</subject>
 <subject>Security clearances</subject>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Background Investigations: Impediments to Consolidating Investigations and Adjudicative Functions</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>GAO concludes that it may be feasible to have one central agency conduct
all background investigations and adjudicative functions. However, most
of the nine key federal agencies that account for 95 percent of the
security clearances oppose consolidation. Moreover several impediments
would have to be resolved. Potential benefits of consolidation include
cost savings, fewer oversight agencies, standardized operating
procedures and information systems, and more consistency in the
application of standards.  However, consolidation could also result in
less agency control over the process, potentially reducing the extent to
which an individual agency&apos;s requirements and priorities are met.  GAO
found that federal agencies are complying with National Security
Directive 63 on single scope background investigations for top secret
clearances.  The purpose of the directive was to eliminate redundant
investigative practices for granting persons access to top secret and
sensitive information.  Consistent with the directive, some agencies now
require even more background information to meet their missions.  For
example, the U.S. Secret Service conduct polygraph tests for its agents
and employees.  In fiscal year 1993, executive branch agencies spent
$326 million on background investigations, $20 million of which sent to
private sector investigators.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-95-101/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-95-101.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-95-101/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-95-101.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-95-101</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-95-101</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-95-101; Background Investigations: Impediments to Consolidating Investigations and Adjudicative Functions;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Investigations by federal agencies</topic>
 <topic>Hiring policies</topic>
 <topic>Centralization</topic>
 <topic>Federal employees</topic>
 <topic>Federal intelligence agencies</topic>
 <topic>Secret records</topic>
 <topic>Executive agencies</topic>
 <topic>Administrative costs</topic>
 <topic>Cost effectiveness analysis</topic>
 <topic>Security clearances</topic>
</subject>
</mods>