<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18039a056">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1994-03-17</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-94-95</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-94-95</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18039a056</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns94095</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-94-95</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-94-95</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-94-95</reportNumber>
 <subject>Sex discrimination</subject>
 <subject>Women</subject>
 <subject>Minorities</subject>
 <subject>Attrition rates</subject>
 <subject>Military service academies</subject>
 <subject>Education program evaluation</subject>
 <subject>Racial discrimination</subject>
 <subject>Military training</subject>
 <subject>Students</subject>
 <subject>Surveys</subject>
 <identifier>Army Cadet Leader Development System</identifier>
 <identifier>DOD Equal Opportunity Program</identifier>
 <type>Chapter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Military Academy: Gender and Racial Disparities</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Male and female cadets differed in some of their experiences at the U.S.
Military Academy. For example, women consistently received offers of
admission at higher rates than men, but also consistently experienced
higher attrition than men. Women&apos;s academic grades were lower than
men&apos;s, particularly during freshman and sophomore years, despite
generally higher academic predictor scores. In contrast, women&apos;s
physical education grades were somewhat higher despite lower predictor
scores in this area. Although reviewed more frequently for Honor Code
violations and for failure to meet academic standards, women were
recommended for separation less often. Although minorities had higher
admission rates than did whites, they had lower academic predictor
scores and lower academic, physical education, and military grades. As a
result, minorities were more frequently reviewed for serious failure to
meet academic standards and fewer minorities graduated in the top
quarter of their class. Minorities were also reviewed at higher rates
than whites for Honor Code infractions and were recommended for
separation for honor reasons at generally higher rates than whites. A
GAO survey of cadets, staff, and faculty revealed perceptions that women
and minorities were generally treated the same as men and whites. Some
male cadets, however, viewed women as receiving better treatment in some
areas. To a somewhat lesser degree, minorities were also viewed as
receiving better treatment.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-94-95/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-94-95.htm</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-94-95</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-94-95</url>
</location>
<note>Chapter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-94-95; Military Academy: Gender and Racial Disparities;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Sex discrimination</topic>
 <topic>Women</topic>
 <topic>Minorities</topic>
 <topic>Attrition rates</topic>
 <topic>Military service academies</topic>
 <topic>Education program evaluation</topic>
 <topic>Racial discrimination</topic>
 <topic>Military training</topic>
 <topic>Students</topic>
 <topic>Surveys</topic>
 <topic>Army Cadet Leader Development System</topic>
 <topic>DOD Equal Opportunity Program</topic>
</subject>
</mods>