<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee1803a3409">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1993-12-23</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-94-84</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-94-84</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee1803a3409</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns94084</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-94-84</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-94-84</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-94-84</reportNumber>
 <subject>Internal controls</subject>
 <subject>NATO military agreements</subject>
 <subject>Nuclear weapons</subject>
 <subject>Defense contingency planning</subject>
 <subject>Compliance</subject>
 <subject>Cost control</subject>
 <subject>NATO military forces</subject>
 <subject>Defense operations</subject>
 <subject>Defense capabilities</subject>
 <identifier>Europe</identifier>
 <identifier>Warsaw Pact</identifier>
 <identifier>Soviet Union</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>NATO Nuclear Bases: U.S. Should Seek Needs Reassessment and Increased Alliance Contributions</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) can maintain a strong
nuclear force and maintain broad Allied participation with fewer strike
bases, and the United States may be able to cut its support costs by
consolidating its nuclear bombs at fewer storage sites. NATO&apos;s most
recent assessment of required nuclear capability assumes that its strike
bases are vulnerable to a massive and sustained Soviet air attack.
Despite the recent collapse of the Soviet Union, NATO has yet to do
additional analyses to see whether fewer bases could provide enough
nuclear capability.  U.S. Air Forces in Europe does not follow Pentagon
and Air Force regulations on implementing and monitoring Allied
compliance with bilateral agreements governing support for U.S. Air
Force custodial units stationed at Allied strike bases.  U.S. Air Forces
in Europe has failed to identify these problems in its annual
evaluations of internal and administrative controls, though required by
law.  As a result, the United States is spending millions of dollars for
facilities, equipment, and other support promised by host nations.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-94-84/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-94-84.htm</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-94-84</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-94-84</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-94-84; NATO Nuclear Bases: U.S. Should Seek Needs Reassessment and Increased Alliance Contributions;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Internal controls</topic>
 <topic>NATO military agreements</topic>
 <topic>Nuclear weapons</topic>
 <topic>Defense contingency planning</topic>
 <topic>Compliance</topic>
 <topic>Cost control</topic>
 <topic>NATO military forces</topic>
 <topic>Defense operations</topic>
 <topic>Defense capabilities</topic>
 <topic>Europe</topic>
 <topic>Warsaw Pact</topic>
 <topic>Soviet Union</topic>
</subject>
</mods>