<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180371934">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1994-01-21</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-94-63</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-94-63</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180371934</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns94063</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-23</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-94-63</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-94-63</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-94-63</reportNumber>
 <subject>Spare parts</subject>
 <subject>Military aircraft</subject>
 <subject>Air Force procurement</subject>
 <subject>Procurement regulation</subject>
 <subject>Military inventories</subject>
 <subject>Military materiel</subject>
 <subject>Aircraft components</subject>
 <subject>Military cost control</subject>
 <subject>Procurement cancellation</subject>
 <subject>Military budgets</subject>
 <identifier>C-17 Aircraft</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>C-17 Aircraft Program: Improvements in Initial Provisioning Process</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Since 1989, when it began initial provisioning for the C-17 aircraft
program, the Air Force has often ordered spare parts prematurely.  As of
July 1993, the Air Force had $111.2 million worth of C-17 spare parts on
order.  In GAO&apos;s view, all of these spare parts were ordered prematurely
because existing inventories could have met the Air Force&apos;s needs.
These premature procurements were made under a Defense Department (DOD)
policy that called for maximizing procurement of support items for the
provisioning period.  Premature ordering occurred because the Air Force
used inaccurate and outdated information to determine how many spare
parts to buy and when to buy them, bought more spare parts than computed
stockage levels justified, and failed to follow regulations governing
the initial provisioning process.  DOD recently revised its guidance to
stress the need to limit the initial procurement of spare parts, thereby
minimizing costs.  As of July 1993, the Air Force had already canceled
nearly $40 million of the $111.2 million worth of C-17 parts on order.
Although the prime contractor has not determined the cancellation costs
for canceled actions, one subcontractor estimated cancellation costs of
about $88,000 on $2.9 million worth of parts that were canceled.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-94-63/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-94-63.htm</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-94-63</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-94-63</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-94-63; C-17 Aircraft Program: Improvements in Initial Provisioning Process;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Spare parts</topic>
 <topic>Military aircraft</topic>
 <topic>Air Force procurement</topic>
 <topic>Procurement regulation</topic>
 <topic>Military inventories</topic>
 <topic>Military materiel</topic>
 <topic>Aircraft components</topic>
 <topic>Military cost control</topic>
 <topic>Procurement cancellation</topic>
 <topic>Military budgets</topic>
 <topic>C-17 Aircraft</topic>
</subject>
</mods>