<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee1803880e2">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1994-06-02</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-94-130</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-94-130</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee1803880e2</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns94130</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-94-130</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-94-130</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-94-130</reportNumber>
 <subject>Army procurement</subject>
 <subject>Procurement practices</subject>
 <subject>Equipment contracts</subject>
 <subject>Inventory control</subject>
 <subject>Military cost control</subject>
 <subject>Procurement cancellation</subject>
 <subject>Inventory control systems</subject>
 <subject>Military inventories</subject>
 <identifier>M1 Tank</identifier>
 <identifier>Saudi Arabia</identifier>
 <identifier>Desert Storm</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Army Inventory: More Effective Review of Proposed Inventory Buys Could Reduce Unneeded Procurement</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>GAO reviewed the termination of planned procurements at the
Tank-Automotive Command (TACOM), one of the Army&apos;s national inventory
control points, and found that TACOM was missing opportunities to
terminate or reduce planned procurements. Item managers and procurement
specialists did not always confer before awarding contracts. Without
communication, procurement personnel may be unaware of new
considerations that could affect the need for the procurement. Item
managers, in deciding whether to implement the requirement system&apos;s
recommended commitment termination or reduction, often changed the
requirements data to bring the requirements and inventory into balance.
In other instances, item managers relied on invalid, out-of-date, or
unverified data in deciding whether to implement the system&apos;s
recommendation. GAO&apos;s analysis of 31 sample items randomly selected from
the universe of 136 items that were in long supply and had items due as
of September 1993 found that procurements valued at nearly $800,000
could have been terminated. Procurements could be reduced as much as
$21.5 million annually if September 1993 was a representative month and
if the recommended commitment cutbacks were made when they first
appeared.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-94-130/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-94-130.htm</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-94-130</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-94-130</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-94-130; Army Inventory: More Effective Review of Proposed Inventory Buys Could Reduce Unneeded Procurement;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Army procurement</topic>
 <topic>Procurement practices</topic>
 <topic>Equipment contracts</topic>
 <topic>Inventory control</topic>
 <topic>Military cost control</topic>
 <topic>Procurement cancellation</topic>
 <topic>Inventory control systems</topic>
 <topic>Military inventories</topic>
 <topic>M1 Tank</topic>
 <topic>Saudi Arabia</topic>
 <topic>Desert Storm</topic>
</subject>
</mods>