<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18037d30a">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-09-07</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>27 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-00-213</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-213</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18037d30a</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns00213</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-213</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-213</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-00-213</reportNumber>
 <subject>Defense industry</subject>
 <subject>Foreign governments</subject>
 <subject>Joint ventures</subject>
 <subject>Defense procurement</subject>
 <subject>Foreign military sales</subject>
 <subject>International trade</subject>
 <subject>Technology transfer</subject>
 <subject>Foreign corporations</subject>
 <subject>International trade regulation</subject>
 <subject>Department of Defense contractors</subject>
 <identifier>NATO</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Defense Trade: Contractors Engage in Varied International</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on U.S.
and European defense contractors&apos; business alliances, focusing on: (1)
the types alliances companies are establishing and their reasons for
forming alliances; (2) why companies prefer certain types of alliances
over others; and (3) whether U.S. laws, regulations, policies, and
practices influence a company&apos;s decision to form an alliance of its
choice or a type of alliance.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) U.S. and European defense companies create teams,
joint ventures, and subsidiaries and sometimes merge with or acquire one
another in order to compete worldwide for the sale of military weapons
systems; (2) two or more companies form a team by negotiating an
agreement to work together to pursue a particular government
procurement, with one company acting as the primary contractor and
others as subcontractors; (3) in contrast, a joint venture is typically
a separate legal entity, either a partnership or a corporation, that two
or more companies form to pursue a discrete market; (4) a subsidiary is
different from both a team and a joint venture because it is wholly
owned by one company and is physically located in another country so
that it may pursue that country&apos;s defense business; (5) defense
companies form these alliances and subsidiaries to access and increase
their competitiveness in other markets; (6) large U.S. companies prefer
to engage in flexible alliances whenever possible; (7) U.S. defense
contractors said they prefer teams to other alliances because teaming
allows companies to choose new partners in each market in which they
wish to compete, increase company capabilities without forming permanent
relationships, and access unique technology needed to meet military
requirements; (8) however, European governments are not always receptive
to teams because they perceive them as alliances led by U.S. companies
using U.S. technology that consign European participants to a subsidiary
role; (9) U.S. companies see significant disadvantages with joint
ventures because the U.S. often abandons multilateral programs before
completion and all governments supporting the joint venture make
decisions that adversely affect its operational efficiency; (10) large
U.S. defense companies do not favor merging with or acquiring major
European dense companies; (11) however, European acquisitions of small
and medium U.S. defense companies are common because they provide access
to the U.S. defense market, which is the world&apos;s largest; (12) companies
GAO reviewed do not consider the U.S. legal and regulatory environment
to be a major impediment to forming an alliance or a principal
determinant of the type of alliance chosen; and (13) U.S. companies are
concerned with the effect a slow technology transfer process can have on
the operation of an alliance and with the effect that a regulation that
requires foreign governments to seek U.S. consent before transferring
purchased alliance products to third parties may have on future alliance
sales.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-213/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-213.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-213/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-213.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-00-213</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-213</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-00-213; Defense Trade: Contractors Engage in Varied International;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Defense industry</topic>
 <topic>Foreign governments</topic>
 <topic>Joint ventures</topic>
 <topic>Defense procurement</topic>
 <topic>Foreign military sales</topic>
 <topic>International trade</topic>
 <topic>Technology transfer</topic>
 <topic>Foreign corporations</topic>
 <topic>International trade regulation</topic>
 <topic>Department of Defense contractors</topic>
 <topic>NATO</topic>
</subject>
</mods>