United States Government Publishing Office publisher pbl distributor dst United States Government Accountability Office National Security and International Affairs Division author aut Government Organization text government publication eng GAOREPORTS Legislative Agency Publications gao legislative 2010-08-12 U.S. Government Printing Office 2000-07-10 monographic deposited born digital 26 p. GA 1.13:NSIAD-00-170 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-170 P0b002ee180397c1e f:ns00170 DGPO 2010-08-12 2011-03-28 GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-170 machine generated eng fdlp REPORT GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-170 NSIAD-00-170 Base realignments Base closures Military bases Military cost control Defense budgets Budget cuts Unexpended budget balances Defense appropriations Budget authority Future budget projections DOD Base Realignment and Closure Account Letter Report NSIAD Pursuant to a legislative requirement, GAO reviewed the Department of Defense's (DOD) base closure accounts and its budget request for base closure activities, focusing on: (1) how trends in base realignment and closure appropriations in recent years and estimates for future years compare to the fiscal year (FY) 2001 budget request; and (2) unliquidated obligations and unobligated balances from prior years' appropriations and the extent to which DOD considered these balances and obligations in preparing the FY 2001 budget request.<p/>GAO noted that: (1) appropriations for the 1990 base closure account have declined steadily since 1996 as more base closure and realignment actions have been completed; (2) however, for FY 2001, DOD is requesting about $1.2 billion in new budget authority, significantly more than last year's appropriation of about $700 million; (3) a larger, $1.6-billion budget request was initially planned for FY 2001, but the final $1.2-billion request resulted from several downward adjustments made as the budget request was being developed; (4) of particular note was a decision by DOD officials to reduce the planning estimate for FY 2001 by $363 million because they did not believe the larger amount could be reasonably executed in FY 2001; (5) additional reductions were made primarily because prior years' environmental cleanup funds were being expended at a slower pace than anticipated; (6) at the time the FY 2001 budget estimate was being developed, DOD had about $500 million in reported unobligated balances from previous years' appropriations in the 1990 account, about $114 million of which was appropriated in FY 1998 or earlier; (7) additionally, it had $1.6 billion in reported unliquidated obligations from prior appropriations in the 1990 account, of which about $115 million were appropriated in 1995 or earlier; (8) the majority of the $115 million were unliquidated funds resulted from environmental cleanup activities that were carried out more slowly than planned; (9) available data indicate that only the Navy provided documentation that it had considered unobligated and unliquidated balances in formulating its portion of the budget request; (10) in finalizing the FY 2001 budget request, Defense Comptroller officials initially proposed reductions of over $200 million because of concerns over slow budget execution and large amounts of unliquidated obligations, but only $53.4 million of these proposed reductions were ultimately approved; and (11) the Army and the Air Force have recently initiated actions to reexamine their prior years' unobligated and unliquidated balances. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-170/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-170.htm https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-170/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-170.pdf GAO/NSIAD-00-170 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-170 Letter Report GAO/NSIAD-00-170; Military Base Closures: Unexpended Funds Raise Questions; Base realignments Base closures Military bases Military cost control Defense budgets Budget cuts Unexpended budget balances Defense appropriations Budget authority Future budget projections DOD Base Realignment and Closure Account S. Rept. 106-74