<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180389177">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-07-06</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>37 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-00-164</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-164</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180389177</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns00164</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-23</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-164</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-164</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-00-164</reportNumber>
 <subject>Defense contingency planning</subject>
 <subject>Combat readiness</subject>
 <subject>Defense capabilities</subject>
 <subject>Mobilization</subject>
 <subject>Military aircraft</subject>
 <subject>Military training</subject>
 <subject>Human resources utilization</subject>
 <subject>Armed forces abroad</subject>
 <identifier>Kosovo (Serbia)</identifier>
 <identifier>Bosnia</identifier>
 <identifier>EA-6B Aircraft</identifier>
 <identifier>Airborne Warning and Control System</identifier>
 <identifier>U-2 Aircraft</identifier>
 <identifier>F-16C/J Aircraft</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Contingency Operations: Providing Critical Capabilities</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO examined the services&apos; ability
to continuously meet the challenges posed by contingency operations,
focusing on six military assets that have been heavily used in
contingency operations in a series of case studies.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) the military assets GAO examined in the case studies
continue to be in high demand relative to their numbers; (2) this has
resulted in deployments in excess of deployment goals; (3) to ease the
strain on these assets, the Department of Defense and the military
services are taking a number of actions, which are described below along
with GAO&apos;s assessment of them; (4) four of the Army&apos;s 10 active
divisions and 1 of its 8 National Guard divisions were being affected by
operations in the Balkans as of January 2000; (5) the Army has begun to
use National Guard divisions to relieve the strain on active divisions
and allow them to focus on their primary mission of being prepared for
major war; (6) however, preparing the first Guard division that deployed
to Bosnia required considerable effort, including the conversion of
substantial numbers of Guard personnel to full-time status; (7) the Army
does not have enough active-duty civil affairs capability to meet
current requirements with its one 208-person active-duty unit, and until
recently, there were concerns about having enough reserve civil affairs
personnel to meet requirements in the Balkans; (8) the Navy and the
Marine Corps each have four land-based EA-6B squadrons; (9) however,
these squadrons together are unable to meet all requirements without
exceeding their deployment goal of having twice as much at home station
as the amount of time deployed; (10) the Air Force could meet current
requirements for Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) aircraft
and crews without exceeding its 120-day annual deployment goal if all 40
of its staffed crews were fully trained and available for worldwide
deployments; (11) however, only 27 of its 40 crews are fully trained,
and increasing this supply is problematic because of inadequate
simulator training capabilities; (12) the Air Force has only 40 of its
54 authorized U-2 pilots fully trained; (13) this shortage of fully
trained pilots has led to historically high deployment rates; (14) the
Air Force has relayed certain requirements to attract and keep its U-2
pilots, however challenges remain and continued careful management of
the use of these aircraft will be needed; (15) F-16CJ squadrons,
particularly those stationed in the United States, have been one of the
most utilized fighter squadrons for the past few years; and (16) however
due to its part-time nature, the F-16CJ reserve component squadron unit
will be able to cover only about 30 days of the rotation between it and
the older squadron of less capable aircraft.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-164/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-164.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-164/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-164.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-00-164</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-164</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-00-164; Contingency Operations: Providing Critical Capabilities;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Defense contingency planning</topic>
 <topic>Combat readiness</topic>
 <topic>Defense capabilities</topic>
 <topic>Mobilization</topic>
 <topic>Military aircraft</topic>
 <topic>Military training</topic>
 <topic>Human resources utilization</topic>
 <topic>Armed forces abroad</topic>
 <topic>Kosovo (Serbia)</topic>
 <topic>Bosnia</topic>
 <topic>EA-6B Aircraft</topic>
 <topic>Airborne Warning and Control System</topic>
 <topic>U-2 Aircraft</topic>
 <topic>F-16C/J Aircraft</topic>
</subject>
</mods>