<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18037aad3">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-07-11</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>58 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-00-149</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-149</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18037aad3</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns00149</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-149</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-149</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-00-149</reportNumber>
 <subject>Naval procurement</subject>
 <subject>Military vessels</subject>
 <subject>Defense contingency planning</subject>
 <subject>Naval warfare</subject>
 <subject>Procurement planning</subject>
 <subject>Weapons systems</subject>
 <subject>Defense capabilities</subject>
 <subject>Military systems analysis</subject>
 <subject>Missiles</subject>
 <identifier>Rolling Airframe Missile</identifier>
 <identifier>MK-15 Phalanx Close-in Weapons System</identifier>
 <identifier>Rearchitectured NATO Sea Sparrow Surface Missile</identifier>
 <identifier>Navy Cooperative Engagement Capability System</identifier>
 <identifier>Navy Ship Self Defense System Mark I/Quick Reaction Combat</identifier>
 <identifier>Capability</identifier>
 <identifier>Aegis Weapon System</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
 <law congress="105" isPrivate="false" number="56"></law>
 <USCode title="10">
                      <section number="2241"></section>
                </USCode>
 <congReport congress="105" number="736" type="CONF"></congReport>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Defense Acquisitions: Comprehensive Strategy Needed to</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO: (1) assessed the Navy&apos;s
progress since 1996 in improving the self-defense capability of surface
ships against cruise missiles; and (2) evaluated Navy plans for meeting
future anti-cruise missile self-defense requirements.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) although the Navy has made some progress in
improving surface ship self-defense capabilities, most ships continue to
have only limited capabilities against cruise missile threats; (2) a
Navy assessment of current surface ship self-defense capabilities
conducted in 1998 concluded that only the 12 Whidbey Island and Harpers
Ferry class amphibious ships have or will be equipped with defensive
systems that can provide measurable improvement against near- and
mid-term cruise missile threats; (3) the assessment projected that none
of the improvements the Navy plans to make in the future would provide
any ship class a high level of self-defense capability against far-term
threats; (4) in projecting ship self-defense capability improvement, the
assessment assumed, among other things, that all planned improvements
would be developed and fielded as scheduled; (5) GAO believes that the
Navy assessment overstates the actual and projected capabilities of
surface ships to protect themselves from cruise missiles because the
models used in the assessment to determine capabilities include a number
of optimistic assumptions that may not reflect the reality of normal
fleet operations; (6) among these assumptions are perfect weather,
uninterrupted equipment availability, and perfect crew and equipment
performance at all times; (7) further, inadequate funding, maintenance,
and repair parts support continue to limit the availability of existing
self-defense equipment; (8) plans for meeting ship self-defense
requirements are not promising because the Navy still does not have a
comprehensive and consistent strategy for improving its capabilities;
(9) previous plans have not included all affected ship classes, have not
always established priorities among ship classes, have not consistently
used a baseline from which to measure progress, and have not provided
timelines for achieving the desired improvements; (10) although Navy
leaders express concern about the vulnerability of surface ships, that
concern may not be reflected in the budget for ship self-defense
programs; and (11) from fiscal years 1997 to 2005, spending is
relatively flat (fluctuating between $719 million and $ billion) and
associated research and development funding is projected to decline from
about $517 million to about $218 million.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-149/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-149.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-149/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-149.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-00-149</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-149</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-00-149; Defense Acquisitions: Comprehensive Strategy Needed to;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Naval procurement</topic>
 <topic>Military vessels</topic>
 <topic>Defense contingency planning</topic>
 <topic>Naval warfare</topic>
 <topic>Procurement planning</topic>
 <topic>Weapons systems</topic>
 <topic>Defense capabilities</topic>
 <topic>Military systems analysis</topic>
 <topic>Missiles</topic>
 <topic>Rolling Airframe Missile</topic>
 <topic>MK-15 Phalanx Close-in Weapons System</topic>
 <topic>Rearchitectured NATO Sea Sparrow Surface Missile</topic>
 <topic>Navy Cooperative Engagement Capability System</topic>
 <topic>Navy Ship Self Defense System Mark I/Quick Reaction Combat</topic>
 <topic>Capability</topic>
 <topic>Aegis Weapon System</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 10 Section 2241</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">10 U.S.C. 2241</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 56 (105th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 105-56</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Conference Report 736 (105th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="congressional report citation">Conf. Rept. 105-736</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>