<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee1803867c4">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-05-31</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>23 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-00-131</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-131</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee1803867c4</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns00131</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-23</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-131</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-131</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-00-131</reportNumber>
 <subject>Ballistic missiles</subject>
 <subject>Weapons systems</subject>
 <subject>Defense cost control</subject>
 <subject>Future budget projections</subject>
 <subject>Air defense systems</subject>
 <subject>Defense capabilities</subject>
 <subject>Schedule slippages</subject>
 <subject>Operational testing</subject>
 <identifier>DOD National Missile Defense System</identifier>
 <identifier>Patriot Missile Advanced Capability-Three Upgrade</identifier>
 <identifier>DOD National Missile Defense Program</identifier>
 <identifier>SDI Theater High Altitude Area Defense System</identifier>
 <type>Other Written Product</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Missile Defense: Status of the National Missile Defense</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the National Missile
Defense program, focusing on: (1) programmatic changes to the program
and whether significant performance and schedule risks remain; and (2)
program officials&apos; efforts to control costs, program estimate, and the
potential for cost increases.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) to reduce risks, the Department of Defense (DOD) has
delayed initial fielding of the National Missile Defense system from
fiscal year 2003 to 2005, delayed program decisions on the production of
radars and interceptors, and increased funding for testing; (2) even
with these programmatic changes, significant performance and schedule
risks remain for several reasons; (3) developing a highly reliable
hit-to-kill capability is a difficult technical challenge; (4) in
various missile defense programs, this capability has been demonstrated
in about 30 percent of the attempted intercepts outside the atmosphere;
(5) only 3 of the 19 planned intercept attempts are scheduled prior to
the July 2000 deployment readiness review; (6) none of these attempts
will expose the interceptor kill vehicle to the higher acceleration and
vibration loads of the much faster, actual system booster; (7) because
the program has a very aggressive schedule, it is vulnerable to delays;
(8) compared to the 15 years estimated to develop and field another
missile defense system called the Theater High Altitude Area Defense
system, the schedule to develop and field the National Missile Defense
system covers only 8 years; (9) DOD told Congress last October that the
development and deployment schedule was compressed by at least 4 years
because of the seriousness of the emerging missile threat from rogue
nations; (10) to control costs, DOD has implemented several measures,
including a process called &quot;cost as an independent variable,&quot; which sets
realistic cost objectives and trades off the system&apos;s performance and
schedule to control costs; (11) officials estimate that the savings from
this process include $4.3 billion from early trade studies conducted by
the prime contractor on alternative mixes of radars and interceptor
locations; (12) after incorporating the expected cost savings from these
measures, the National Missile Defense program office estimated that the
approved program would cost $36.2 billion over the life of the
Capability I system or about $7.5 billion more than its 1999 estimate;
(13) the cost increased mostly because of the decision to increase the
number of interceptors and add flight tests, ground-test equipment, and
a more capable radar facility; and (14) using current spending rates the
program office estimates that each month of delay would increase program
costs by $124 million.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-131/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-131.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-131/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-131.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-00-131</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-00-131</url>
</location>
<note>Other Written Product</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-00-131; Missile Defense: Status of the National Missile Defense;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Ballistic missiles</topic>
 <topic>Weapons systems</topic>
 <topic>Defense cost control</topic>
 <topic>Future budget projections</topic>
 <topic>Air defense systems</topic>
 <topic>Defense capabilities</topic>
 <topic>Schedule slippages</topic>
 <topic>Operational testing</topic>
 <topic>DOD National Missile Defense System</topic>
 <topic>Patriot Missile Advanced Capability-Three Upgrade</topic>
 <topic>DOD National Missile Defense Program</topic>
 <topic>SDI Theater High Altitude Area Defense System</topic>
</subject>
</mods>