<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180373020">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Health, Education, and Human Services Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999-02-26</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>40 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:HEHS-99-31</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-99-31</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180373020</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:he99031</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-HEHS-99-31</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-HEHS-99-31</accessId>
 <reportNumber>HEHS-99-31</reportNumber>
 <subject>Social security benefits</subject>
 <subject>Comparative analysis</subject>
 <subject>Municipal employees</subject>
 <subject>Retirement benefits</subject>
 <subject>Disability benefits</subject>
 <identifier>Social Security Disability Insurance Program</identifier>
 <identifier>Galveston County (TX)</identifier>
 <identifier>Brazoria County (TX)</identifier>
 <identifier>Matagorda County (TX)</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>HEHS</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Social Security Reform: Experience of the Alternate Plans in Texas</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on three
Texas counties&apos; employee retirement plans; known as Alternate Plans,
focusing on: (1) comparing the principal features and benefits of these
plans with those of social security; and (2) simulating the retirement,
survivor, and disability benefits that individuals in varying
circumstances might receive under the Alternate Plans and under social
security.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) while social security and the Alternate Plans offer
retirement, disability, and survivor benefits to qualified workers,
there are fundamental differences in the purpose and structure of the
two approaches; (2) Social Security is a social insurance program
designed to provide a basic level of retirement income to help retired
workers, disabled workers, and their dependents and survivors stay out
of poverty; (3) Social Security benefits are tilted to provide
relatively higher benefits to low-wage earners, and the benefits are
fully indexed to protect against inflation; (4) social security is a
pay-as-you-go system that is projected to produce a negative cash flow
in 2013 and become insolvent by 2032; (5) the Alternate Plans are
advance funded plans; the contributions made by workers and their
employers, which total 13.915 percent of workers&apos; pay, and the earnings
made on those invested contributions are used to fund retirement
benefits; (6) the Alternate Plans&apos; benefits are directly linked to
contributions, so that retirement income is based on accumulated
contributions and the earnings thereon; (7) at retirement, the worker
can take the money in the account as a lump sum or select from a number
of monthly payout options, including the purchase of a lifetime annuity;
(8) GAO found that certain features of social security, such as the
progressive benefit formula and the allowance for spousal benefits, are
important factors in providing larger benefits than the Alternate Plans
for low-wage earners, single-earner couples, and individuals with
dependents; (9) many median-wage earners, while initially receiving
higher benefits under the Alternate Plans, would also have received
larger benefits under social security after 4 and 12 years after
retirement, because social security benefits are indexed for inflation;
(10) the Alternate Plans provide larger benefits for higher-wage workers
than social security would, but in some cases, such as when spousal
benefits are involved, social security benefits could also exceed those
of the Alternate Plans; (11) survivor benefits often would be greater
under social security than under the Alternate Plans, especially when a
worker died at a relatively young age and had dependant children; (12)
with regard to disability benefits, all workers in GAO&apos;s simulations
would receive higher initial benefits under the Alternate Plans; and
(13) it is important to note that the Alternate Plans performance is not
necessarily indicative of how well a proposed system of individual
accounts with social security might perform.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-99-31/html/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-99-31.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-99-31/pdf/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-99-31.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/HEHS-99-31</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-99-31</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/HEHS-99-31; Social Security Reform: Experience of the Alternate Plans in Texas;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Social security benefits</topic>
 <topic>Comparative analysis</topic>
 <topic>Municipal employees</topic>
 <topic>Retirement benefits</topic>
 <topic>Disability benefits</topic>
 <topic>Social Security Disability Insurance Program</topic>
 <topic>Galveston County (TX)</topic>
 <topic>Brazoria County (TX)</topic>
 <topic>Matagorda County (TX)</topic>
</subject>
</mods>