<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18038ab81">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Health, Education, and Human Services Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-11-16</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>36 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:HEHS-99-10</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-99-10</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18038ab81</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:he99010</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-HEHS-99-10</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-HEHS-99-10</accessId>
 <reportNumber>HEHS-99-10</reportNumber>
 <subject>Funds management</subject>
 <subject>Educational grants</subject>
 <subject>Block grants</subject>
 <subject>Grants to local governments</subject>
 <subject>Grants to states</subject>
 <subject>Federal grants</subject>
 <subject>School districts</subject>
 <subject>Teacher education</subject>
 <subject>Educational standards</subject>
 <identifier>Goals 2000</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>HEHS</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Goals 2000: Flexible Funding Supports State and Local Education Reform</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Goals 2000
Program, focusing on determining how: (1) its funds have been spent at
both the state and local levels, including the levels of funding for
developing standards and assessments as well as health education; and
(2) state and local officials view Goals 2000 as a means to promote
education reform efforts.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) Goals 2000 funds are being used to support a broad
range of education reform activities at the state and local levels; (2)
grants to states in the 4 fiscal years (FY) that GAO reviewed ranged
from $370,000 to Wyoming in FY 1994 to $54.7 million to California in FY
1997; (3) over the 4-year period reviewed, Goals 2000 funds have been
broadly disseminated: more than one-third of the 14,367 school districts
nationwide that provide instructional services have received at least
one Goals 2000 subgrant funded with fiscal years 1994 through 1997
funds; (4) state-retained funds were spent primarily for personnel,
contracting services, and consultants involved in fund related
activities; (5) districts used Goals 2000 subgrant funds to pay for
education reform initiatives centered around several major categories:
local education reform; professional development; and technology
acquisition and training; (6) other uses included preservice training
for college students who plan on becoming teachers; the development of
education standards and assessments; and crosscutting and other
activities; (7) most states had begun their state education reform
efforts prior to receiving Goals 2000 funds, thus Goals 2000 funds have
generally served as an additional resource for ongoing state reform
efforts; (8) the districts&apos; Goals 2000 activities appear to be aligned
with state education reform initiatives; (9) many state officials
reported that Goals 2000 has been a significant factor in promoting
their education reform efforts and, in several cases, was a catalyst for
some aspect of the state&apos;s reform movement; (10) state and local
officials said that Goals 2000 funding provided valuable assistance and
that, without this funding, some reform efforts would not have been
accomplished so quickly if at all; (11) state officials told GAO they
supported the flexible funding design of the Goals 2000 state grants
program as a way of helping them reach their own state&apos;s education
reform goals, and the program was achieving its purpose of supporting
systemic education reform in states and districts; (12) a number of
state officials noted that Congress&apos; discussions about combining Goals
2000 funding with other federal funding in block grant approach caused
them concern, as they believe the increased flexibility of a block grant
could increase the risk that the funds would not be spent on education
reform; (13) however, Goals 2000 appears to be accomplishing what
Congress intended; and (14) it is providing an additional and flexible
funding source to promote coordinated improvements to state and local
education systems.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-99-10/html/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-99-10.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-99-10/pdf/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-99-10.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/HEHS-99-10</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-99-10</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/HEHS-99-10; Goals 2000: Flexible Funding Supports State and Local Education Reform;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Funds management</topic>
 <topic>Educational grants</topic>
 <topic>Block grants</topic>
 <topic>Grants to local governments</topic>
 <topic>Grants to states</topic>
 <topic>Federal grants</topic>
 <topic>School districts</topic>
 <topic>Teacher education</topic>
 <topic>Educational standards</topic>
 <topic>Goals 2000</topic>
</subject>
</mods>