<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18038b0f8">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Health, Education, and Human Services Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-02-27</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>59 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:HEHS-98-79</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-98-79</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18038b0f8</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:he98079</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-HEHS-98-79</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-HEHS-98-79</accessId>
 <reportNumber>HEHS-98-79</reportNumber>
 <subject>Health care programs</subject>
 <subject>Medical fees</subject>
 <subject>Malpractice (medical)</subject>
 <subject>Medical services rates</subject>
 <subject>Proposed legislation</subject>
 <subject>Health care costs</subject>
 <subject>Medical economic analysis</subject>
 <subject>Physicians</subject>
 <subject>Overhead costs</subject>
 <subject>Statistical methods</subject>
 <identifier>Medicare Program</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>HEHS</seriesAbbrev>
 <law congress="99" isPrivate="false" number="272"></law>
 <law congress="101" isPrivate="false" number="239"></law>
 <law congress="103" isPrivate="false" number="432"></law>
 <law congress="105" isPrivate="false" number="33"></law>
 <statuteAtLarge volume="100">
                      <pages pages="82"></pages>
                </statuteAtLarge>
 <statuteAtLarge volume="103">
                      <pages pages="2106"></pages>
                </statuteAtLarge>
 <statuteAtLarge volume="108">
                      <pages pages="4398"></pages>
                </statuteAtLarge>
 <statuteAtLarge volume="111">
                      <pages pages="251"></pages>
                </statuteAtLarge>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Medicare: HCFA Can Improve Methods for Revising Physician Practice Expense Payments</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a legislative requirement, GAO reviewed the Health Care
Financing Administration&apos;s (HCFA) proposed practice expense revisions
and its ongoing efforts to refine its data and methodologies, focusing
on: (1) HCFA&apos;s approach for estimating the practice expenses directly
associated with each medical service or procedure; (2) two methodologies
HCFA used to adjust the direct expense estimates; (3) practice expenses
excluded or limited by HCFA; (4) HCFA&apos;s method for assigning indirect
practice expenses to each medical service or procedure; and (5) the
potential impact of the new fee schedule allowances on beneficiary
access to care.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) HCFA used expert panels--consisting of physicians,
administrators, and nonphysician clinicians--to estimate the direct
labor and other direct practice expenses associated with medical service
or procedures; (2) GAO explored alternative primary data gathering
methods, such as mailing out surveys, using existing survey data, and
gathering data on-site; (3) GAO concluded that each of those methods has
practical limitations that preclude its use as a reasonable alternative
to HCFA&apos;s use of expert panels; (4) gathering data directly from a
limited number of physician practices would, however, be a useful
external validity check on HCFA&apos;s practice expense rankings and would
also help HCFA identify refinements needed during phase-in of the fee
schedule revision; (5) the panels&apos; estimates of direct practice expenses
needed several types of adjustment; (6) GAO found problems, however,
with one of HCFA&apos;s adjustment methods, which substantially altered the
practice expense rankings; (7) specifically, HCFA used a statistical
model to reconcile significant differences among various panels&apos;
estimates for the same procedure; (8) GAO identified technical
weaknesses in the model that may have biased the estimates; (9) HCFA
excluded some physician practice expenses from the panels&apos; estimates
because it believes that Medicare pays for those expenses through other
mechanisims; (10) physician groups, however, argue that shifts in
medical practices have resulted in physicians absorbing these expenses;
(11) HCFA also placed upper limits on the panels&apos; administrative and
clinical labor estimates; and although these limits seem reasonable to
HCFA, they are not supported by any data or analysis; (12) HCFA&apos;s method
for assessing indirect expenses to medical procedures is
acceptable--there is no single best way on the basis of each procedure&apos;s
total relative value units (RVU) for physician work, direct practice
expenses, and malpractice expenses, factors that likely reflect some of
the variation on the ratio between direct and indirect expenses among
physician specialties; (13) however, the survey data collected by a
physician organization might provide more straightforward estimates of
specialty--specific indirect cost ratios, and that organization is
willing to expand its survey for HCFA&apos;s use; and (14) the 1992
implementation of the fee schedule resulted in lower Medicare payments
to some medical specialities, but subsequent studies found that Medicare
beneficiaries&apos; access to care remained very good.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-98-79/html/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-98-79.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-98-79/pdf/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-98-79.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/HEHS-98-79</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-98-79</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/HEHS-98-79; Medicare: HCFA Can Improve Methods for Revising Physician Practice Expense Payments;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Health care programs</topic>
 <topic>Medical fees</topic>
 <topic>Malpractice (medical)</topic>
 <topic>Medical services rates</topic>
 <topic>Proposed legislation</topic>
 <topic>Health care costs</topic>
 <topic>Medical economic analysis</topic>
 <topic>Physicians</topic>
 <topic>Overhead costs</topic>
 <topic>Statistical methods</topic>
 <topic>Medicare Program</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Statutes at Large</title>
  <partNumber>Volume 100 Page 82</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="Statute citation">100 Stat. 82</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Statutes at Large</title>
  <partNumber>Volume 103 Page 2106</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="Statute citation">103 Stat. 2106</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Statutes at Large</title>
  <partNumber>Volume 108 Page 4398</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="Statute citation">108 Stat. 4398</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Statutes at Large</title>
  <partNumber>Volume 111 Page 251</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="Statute citation">111 Stat. 251</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 272 (99th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 99-272</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 239 (101st Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 101-239</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 432 (103rd Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 103-432</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 33 (105th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 105-33</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>