<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180391815">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Health, Education, and Human Services Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-02-06</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>56 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:HEHS-98-51</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-98-51</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180391815</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:he98051</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-HEHS-98-51</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-HEHS-98-51</accessId>
 <reportNumber>HEHS-98-51</reportNumber>
 <subject>Comparative analysis</subject>
 <subject>Managed health care</subject>
 <subject>Military personnel</subject>
 <subject>Health centers</subject>
 <subject>Customer service</subject>
 <subject>Surveys</subject>
 <subject>Health care services</subject>
 <subject>Beneficiaries</subject>
 <identifier>DOD TRICARE Program</identifier>
 <identifier>NCQA Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set</identifier>
 <identifier>DOD TRICARE Standard Program</identifier>
 <identifier>DOD TRICARE Prime Program</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>HEHS</seriesAbbrev>
 <law congress="102" isPrivate="false" number="484"></law>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Defense Health Care: DOD Could Improve Its Beneficiary Feedback Approaches</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed: (1) whether the
Department of Defense (DOD) solicits feedback from beneficiaries of its
managed health care program, TRICARE, and, if so, how this is done and
what the data show; (2) what other means are available to beneficiaries
to provide feedback and what such beneficiary-initiated feedback could
reveal about TRICARE&apos;s success; and (3) how DOD&apos;s approaches to
obtaining feedback compare with the private sector&apos;s and whether
opportunities exist to improve DOD&apos;s beneficiary feedback tracking and
reporting.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) DOD obtains and uses TRICARE beneficiary feedback in
several ways across the military health system (MHS): (2) DOD conducts a
broad annual beneficiary questionnaire survey and a monthly survey of
patients&apos; perceptions of military treatment facilities (MTF) outpatient
visits--both of which are based on private-sector models--to measure
levels of satisfaction with TRICARE; (3) DOD reports the survey results
throughout the MHS; (4) DOD does not conduct such surveys of MTF
inpatient users or civilian network care users, though DOD officials
told GAO that they are now planning to develop an MTF inpatient survey;
(5) as TRICARE continues to be phased in across the MHS, DOD&apos;s annual
surveys are indicating fairly levels of overall beneficiary satisfaction
with the program, but lower satisfaction levels with aspects of military
care; (6) DOD also tracks and reports beneficiary-initiated
feedback--complaints and other comments--in ways that vary throughout
the MHS; (7) a wide range exists in how much feedback information is
tracked and in how the different levels of units that compose
TRICARE--and other DOD offices--do the tracking; (8)
beneficiary-initiated feedback reporting throughout the MHS varies as
well; (9) because of the variability of DOD&apos;s recording of these data,
reliably depicting the range, magnitude, or frequency of beneficiary
feedback about TRICARE is not possible; (10) private health care
managers rely extensively on beneficiary feedback; (11) surveys, which
provide data about whole customer populations, and customer-initiated
complaints, which show where specific problems have occurred, are used
together as key tools to measure plan performance and identify systemic
problems; (12) while no direct private-sector parallel to MHS exists,
DOD&apos;s feedback efforts are somewhat similar to the private sector&apos;s,
although adopting certain private practices might improve DOD&apos;s feedback
systems; (13) more reliable beneficiary feedback data would also help
DOD to make customer satisfaction an outcome measure in the next round
of TRICARE contracts, which DOD is trying to base more on outcomes and
less on process; and (14) but, to improve its beneficiary feedback
approaches, DOD will need to consider a number of cost-benefit issues,
the varying sophistication levels of beneficiary feedback management
throughout MHS, and other matters.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-98-51/html/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-98-51.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-98-51/pdf/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-98-51.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/HEHS-98-51</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-98-51</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/HEHS-98-51; Defense Health Care: DOD Could Improve Its Beneficiary Feedback Approaches;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Comparative analysis</topic>
 <topic>Managed health care</topic>
 <topic>Military personnel</topic>
 <topic>Health centers</topic>
 <topic>Customer service</topic>
 <topic>Surveys</topic>
 <topic>Health care services</topic>
 <topic>Beneficiaries</topic>
 <topic>DOD TRICARE Program</topic>
 <topic>NCQA Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set</topic>
 <topic>DOD TRICARE Standard Program</topic>
 <topic>DOD TRICARE Prime Program</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 484 (102nd Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 102-484</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>