<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180399295">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Health, Education, and Human Services Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-04-29</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>31 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:HEHS-98-121</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-98-121</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180399295</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:he98121</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-HEHS-98-121</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-HEHS-98-121</accessId>
 <reportNumber>HEHS-98-121</reportNumber>
 <subject>Physicians</subject>
 <subject>Military personnel</subject>
 <subject>Medical education</subject>
 <subject>Graduate education</subject>
 <subject>Base closures</subject>
 <subject>Health care programs</subject>
 <subject>Military downsizing</subject>
 <subject>Military cost control</subject>
 <subject>Site selection</subject>
 <subject>Combat readiness</subject>
 <identifier>DOD TRICARE Program</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>HEHS</seriesAbbrev>
 <law congress="105" isPrivate="false" number="85"></law>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Defense Health Care: Collaboration and Criteria Needed For Sizing Graduate Medical Education</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a legislative requirement, GAO reviewed a Navy advisory
council&apos;s recommendations for restructuring Navy graduate medical
education (GME) focusing on: (1) why the Navy did not accept its
council&apos;s recommendations for Bethesda GME closures and why its other
closure attempts did not succeed; (2) whether the other services already
have faced or may face similar experiences; and (3) what improvements
may be needed if the services are to successfully make and implement
their GME sizing decisions.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) in early 1997, the Navy Surgeon General decided to
eliminate 162 GME positions to comply with lower projected wartime
requirements and with Department of Defense (DOD) restrictions on the
ratio of physicians in training to those deployable; (2) a Navy advisory
council, lacking specific guidance but responding to the Navy Surgeon
General&apos;s indications that GME should occur where active duty personnel
are concentrated, recommended that such training be dropped at the
Bethesda Medical Center; (3) the Navy Surgeon General, however, instead
decided to close some of the Navy&apos;s Portsmouth Medical Center&apos;s programs
following a then newly discussed agreement among DOD and the services&apos;
surgeons general to concentrate GME in four geographic locations that
included Bethesda and San Diego but not Portsmouth; (4) lacking site
selection guidance, the council submitted its recommendation to the
Surgeon General without taking account of the agreement, which has never
been formalized or acted on by the other services; (5) when announced,
the Portsmouth closure decision surprised Navy command and medical
center officials there, as well as local congressional representatives;
(6) publicized arguments ensued that Portsmouth was as advantageous as
Bethesda for concentrating GME and that losing Portsmouth&apos;s GME would
reduce trainee-provided health care to active duty personnel and other
beneficiaries and would harm Navy readiness; (7) although it was
unsuccessful, the Surgeon General&apos;s office tried justifying the decision
and later withdrew it for further study; (8) shortly thereafter and for
the same ends, the Army Surgeon General&apos;s office sought to eliminate the
64 GME positions at the William Beaumont Medical Center in El Paso,
Texas, also without site selection guidance and likewise failing to
involve those who were affected; (9) while the Air Force also foresees
the need for GME program closures, it has not yet attempted to make
them; (10) but in the absence of closure policies and criteria and
judging from the Navy&apos;s and Army&apos;s closure attempt experiences, GAO has
no reason to believe that the Air Force would be any more successful in
bringing about required GME program adjustments; and (11) while not a
direct parallel to DOD GME with its readiness dimension, private-sector
medical schools and hospitals have been downsizing their GME programs
and in doing so have documented success factors that may provide a
useful reference for DOD in developing guidance for its future sizing
efforts.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-98-121/html/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-98-121.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-98-121/pdf/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-98-121.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/HEHS-98-121</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-98-121</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/HEHS-98-121; Defense Health Care: Collaboration and Criteria Needed For Sizing Graduate Medical Education;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Physicians</topic>
 <topic>Military personnel</topic>
 <topic>Medical education</topic>
 <topic>Graduate education</topic>
 <topic>Base closures</topic>
 <topic>Health care programs</topic>
 <topic>Military downsizing</topic>
 <topic>Military cost control</topic>
 <topic>Site selection</topic>
 <topic>Combat readiness</topic>
 <topic>DOD TRICARE Program</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 85 (105th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 105-85</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>