<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18038da52">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Health, Education, and Human Services Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997-01-27</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>43 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:HEHS-97-25</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-97-25</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18038da52</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:he97025</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-HEHS-97-25</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-HEHS-97-25</accessId>
 <reportNumber>HEHS-97-25</reportNumber>
 <subject>Breast cancer</subject>
 <subject>Disease detection or diagnosis</subject>
 <subject>Medical equipment</subject>
 <subject>Women</subject>
 <subject>Management information systems</subject>
 <subject>Quality control</subject>
 <subject>Inspection</subject>
 <subject>Noncompliance</subject>
 <subject>Sanctions</subject>
 <subject>Health care facilities</subject>
 <identifier>FDA Mammography Certification Program</identifier>
 <identifier>FDA Automated Mammography Facility Inspection Database</identifier>
 <identifier>FDA Inspector Audit Program</identifier>
 <identifier>California</identifier>
 <identifier>Illinois</identifier>
 <identifier>Michigan</identifier>
 <identifier>Arizona</identifier>
 <identifier>Georgia</identifier>
 <identifier>Louisiana</identifier>
 <identifier>North Carolina</identifier>
 <identifier>Washington</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>HEHS</seriesAbbrev>
 <USCode title="42">
                      <section detail="(i)(2)" number="263b"></section>
                </USCode>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>FDA&apos;s Mammography Inspections: While Some Problems Need Attention, Facility Compliance Is Growing</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a legislative requirement, GAO reviewed the Food and Drug
Administration&apos;s (FDA) program for implementing the requirements of the
Mammography Quality Standards Act of 1992, focusing on: (1) the extent
to which facilities are complying with the new mammography standards;
(2) whether FDA&apos;s procedures for evaluating image quality at mammography
facilities are adequate; and (3) whether FDA&apos;s monitoring and
enforcement process ensures timely correction of mammography
deficiencies.&lt;p/&gt;GAO found that: (1) GAO&apos;s work points to growing compliance by
facilities with FDA&apos;s mammography standards; (2) FDA&apos;s first annual
inspection began in January 1995, and by mid-1996, over 9,000 facilities
had been inspected, and approximately 1,500 of these had undergone two
rounds of inspections; (3) the first time these 1,500 facilities were
evaluated, 26 percent had significant violations, but the second-year
inspection revealed that this figure had dropped to about 10 percent;
(4) the percentage of facilities with less significant deviations from
quality standards had decreased; (5) while these results are positive,
GAO did note some differences in how inspectors are conducting
inspections that, left unaddressed, could lead to inconsistent reporting
of violations, thereby limiting FDA&apos;s ability to determine the full
effect of the inspection process and to identify the extent of repeat
violations; (6) GAO&apos;s review of FDA&apos;s actions during the first 18 months
of its inspection program showed a need for management attention to two
additional aspects of the inspection program; (7) FDA&apos;s inspection
procedures for an important test of mammography equipment were
inadequate; (8) the way this test, called the phantom image test, was
conducted was open to variability, which could have resulted in
differing assessments of how well the equipment functioned; (9) in those
instances in which test results showed serious problems with the phantom
image quality, FDA&apos;s procedures allowed facilities to continue taking
mammograms without follow-up to evaluate whether their quality was
actually acceptable; (10) without such follow-up review, women are not
fully protected from getting poor mammograms from facilities with
potentially severe quality problems; (11) at the time of GAO&apos;s review,
FDA also lacked procedures to ensure that all violations of standards
were both corrected and corrected in a timely manner; (12) FDA&apos;s program
lacked criteria for defining conditions constituting a serious risk to
human health, which could delay enforcement of compliance and
notification to women who may have received substandard mammograms; (13)
for facilities with less severe but persistent violations, FDA&apos;s
follow-up efforts could not always ensure corrective action was taken;
and (14) delays in completing a management information system have kept
FDA&apos;s compliance staff from having complete, up-to-date information abo*</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-97-25/html/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-97-25.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-97-25/pdf/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-97-25.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/HEHS-97-25</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-97-25</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/HEHS-97-25; FDA&apos;s Mammography Inspections: While Some Problems Need Attention, Facility Compliance Is Growing;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Breast cancer</topic>
 <topic>Disease detection or diagnosis</topic>
 <topic>Medical equipment</topic>
 <topic>Women</topic>
 <topic>Management information systems</topic>
 <topic>Quality control</topic>
 <topic>Inspection</topic>
 <topic>Noncompliance</topic>
 <topic>Sanctions</topic>
 <topic>Health care facilities</topic>
 <topic>FDA Mammography Certification Program</topic>
 <topic>FDA Automated Mammography Facility Inspection Database</topic>
 <topic>FDA Inspector Audit Program</topic>
 <topic>California</topic>
 <topic>Illinois</topic>
 <topic>Michigan</topic>
 <topic>Arizona</topic>
 <topic>Georgia</topic>
 <topic>Louisiana</topic>
 <topic>North Carolina</topic>
 <topic>Washington</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 42 Section 263b(i)(2)</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">42 U.S.C. 263b(i)(2)</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>