<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18039b2ff">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Health, Education, and Human Services Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1995-12-19</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>60 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:HEHS-96-39</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-96-39</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18039b2ff</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:he96039</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-HEHS-96-39</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-HEHS-96-39</accessId>
 <reportNumber>HEHS-96-39</reportNumber>
 <subject>Intergovernmental fiscal relations</subject>
 <subject>State/local relations</subject>
 <subject>Litigation</subject>
 <subject>Property taxes</subject>
 <subject>Public schools</subject>
 <subject>Financial management systems</subject>
 <subject>Students</subject>
 <subject>Judicial remedies</subject>
 <identifier>Texas</identifier>
 <identifier>Minnesota</identifier>
 <identifier>Tennessee</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>HEHS</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>School Finance: Three States&apos; Experiences with Equity in School Funding</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the experiences of
three states that reformed their school finance systems, focusing on
the: (1) reforms made to each school finance system; (2) legal,
budgetary, and political pressures that their state legislatures faced
in making the finance reforms; and (3) impact of the legislative
remedies in addressing educational funding disparities.&lt;p/&gt;GAO found that: (1) lawsuits prompted each state to address the
education funding disparities within its district; (2) the legislative
solutions in all three states helped poor districts without harming the
educational programs of wealthy districts and were sensitive to public
sentiments concerning property taxes; and (3) other states undergoing
similar education finance reforms should define the equity goals of
their school finance systems in terms of the funding needed to achieve a
certain level of student performance, link funding reform with greater
accountability for student performance, and encourage all groups
affected by education finance reform to participate in the
decision-making process.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-96-39/html/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-96-39.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-96-39/pdf/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-96-39.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/HEHS-96-39</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-96-39</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/HEHS-96-39; School Finance: Three States&apos; Experiences with Equity in School Funding;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Intergovernmental fiscal relations</topic>
 <topic>State/local relations</topic>
 <topic>Litigation</topic>
 <topic>Property taxes</topic>
 <topic>Public schools</topic>
 <topic>Financial management systems</topic>
 <topic>Students</topic>
 <topic>Judicial remedies</topic>
 <topic>Texas</topic>
 <topic>Minnesota</topic>
 <topic>Tennessee</topic>
</subject>
</mods>