<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18037512a">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Health, Education, and Human Services Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1996-03-19</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>51 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:HEHS-96-30</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-96-30</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18037512a</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:he96030</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-HEHS-96-30</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-HEHS-96-30</accessId>
 <reportNumber>HEHS-96-30</reportNumber>
 <subject>Laboratories</subject>
 <subject>Test facilities</subject>
 <subject>Site selection</subject>
 <subject>Cost effectiveness analysis</subject>
 <subject>Federal facility relocation</subject>
 <subject>Obsolete facilities</subject>
 <subject>Food and drug law</subject>
 <subject>Federal agency reorganization</subject>
 <subject>Product safety</subject>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>HEHS</seriesAbbrev>
 <USCode title="21">
                      <section number="301"></section>
                </USCode>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>FDA Laboratories: Magnitude of Benefits Associated With Consolidation Is Questionable</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Food and Drug
Administration&apos;s (FDA) plan to consolidate its Office of Regulatory
Affairs&apos; (ORA) 18 field laboratories for product testing, focusing on:
(1) the validity of projected cost savings and operational efficiencies;
and (2) site selection criteria.&lt;p/&gt;GAO found that: (1) the 20-year consolidation plan, known as ORA 21,
proposes to create 5 mega-laboratories and 4 special-purpose
laboratories; (2) ORA based its plan on the belief that its current
facilities are old, need costly repairs, and do not meet the needs for
conducting regulatory science in the future; (3) ORA may have overstated
the consolidation plan&apos;s projected cost savings because ORA made several
assumptions about replacement costs, construction costs, and space and
staffing requirements; (4) the plan&apos;s claims for achieving greater
operational efficiencies are also questionable, and ORA did not
substantiate claims regarding obsolete equipment, supervisor/analyst
ratios, laboratory efficiency, and staff relocation; and (5) ORA
conducted limited analysis of the relative efficiency of proposed
laboratory sites and based its site selections on areas where it
believed that it would receive congressional funding approval.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-96-30/html/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-96-30.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-96-30/pdf/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-96-30.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/HEHS-96-30</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-HEHS-96-30</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/HEHS-96-30; FDA Laboratories: Magnitude of Benefits Associated With Consolidation Is Questionable;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Laboratories</topic>
 <topic>Test facilities</topic>
 <topic>Site selection</topic>
 <topic>Cost effectiveness analysis</topic>
 <topic>Federal facility relocation</topic>
 <topic>Obsolete facilities</topic>
 <topic>Food and drug law</topic>
 <topic>Federal agency reorganization</topic>
 <topic>Product safety</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 21 Section 301</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">21 U.S.C. 301</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>