United States Government Publishing Office publisher pbl distributor dst United States Government Accountability Office General Government Division author aut Government Organization text government publication eng GAOREPORTS Legislative Agency Publications gao legislative 2010-08-12 U.S. Government Printing Office 1998-03-06 monographic deposited born digital 24 p. GA 1.13:GGD/AIMD-98-51 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-AIMD-98-51 P0b002ee180395741 f:g198051 DGPO 2010-08-12 2011-03-23 GAOREPORTS-GGD-AIMD-98-51 machine generated eng fdlp REPORT GAOREPORTS-GGD-AIMD-98-51 GGD/AIMD-98-51 Systems conversions Strategic information systems planning Information resources management Data integrity Brokerage industry Reporting requirements Securities Computer software Letter Report GGD AIMD Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) report on the status of its efforts to ensure that its computer systems, as well as those used by participants in the securities industry, are ready for the date changeover in the year 2000, focusing on: (1) SEC's June 1997 report on the status of year 2000 compliance by SEC, the securities industry, and public companies to identify any ways that future reports might be improved; (2) the adequacy of SEC's oversight of the year 2000 remediation efforts directed at its internal systems, self-regulatory organizations (SRO), broker-dealers, and other regulated entities; and (3) the guidance SEC has provided to public companies for disclosing year 2000 remediation efforts.<p/>GAO noted that: (1) SEC's first report in June 1997 provided an overview of the efforts that SEC and various industry participants had made to address year 2000 issues, but did not contain the specific, detailed information that Congress will need to assess progress as the year 2000 approaches; (2) according to an agency official, SEC had collected more detailed information from some market participants, such as SROs; (3) the official said that SEC did not include this information in the report because SEC had been focused on assessing the extent to which market participants were aware of the year 2000 problem and had begun taking steps to address it; (4) the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) reporting format offers guidance on the type of detailed information SEC might provide Congress in future reports; (5) such information includes: (a) the systems considered critical to the continued functioning of the U.S. securities markets; (b) the progress made in moving these systems through the various phases of achieving year 2000 compliance; (c) the timeframes required to complete each phase; (d) the efforts necessary to address systems that are behind schedule; and (e) the contingency plans for systems that may not be ready in time; and (6) also, as the year 2000 approaches and less time to make adjustments is available, SEC's yearly progress updates may be too infrequent for congressional needs. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-AIMD-98-51/html/GAOREPORTS-GGD-AIMD-98-51.htm https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-AIMD-98-51/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GGD-AIMD-98-51.pdf GAO/GGD/AIMD-98-51 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-AIMD-98-51 Letter Report GAO/GGD/AIMD-98-51; SEC Year 2000 Report: Future Reports Could Provide More Detailed Information; Systems conversions Strategic information systems planning Information resources management Data integrity Brokerage industry Reporting requirements Securities Computer software