<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180392720">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999-03-30</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>68 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GGD-99-31</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-99-31</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180392720</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg99031</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-23</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GGD-99-31</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GGD-99-31</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GGD-99-31</reportNumber>
 <subject>Smuggling</subject>
 <subject>Drug trafficking</subject>
 <subject>Internal controls</subject>
 <subject>Federal employees</subject>
 <subject>Personnel management</subject>
 <subject>Customs administration</subject>
 <subject>Ethical conduct</subject>
 <subject>Bribery</subject>
 <type>Chapter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
 <law congress="100" isPrivate="false" number="503"></law>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Drug Control: INS and Customs Can Do More To Prevent Drug-Related Employee Corruption</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Immigration and
Naturalization Service&apos;s (INS) and the U.S. Customs Service&apos;s efforts to
address employee corruption on the Southwest Border, focusing on: (1)
the extent to which INS and Customs have and comply with policies and
procedures for ensuring employee integrity; (2) identifying and
comparing the Department of Justice&apos;s (DOJ) and Department of the
Treasury&apos;s organizational structures, policies, and procedures for
handling allegations of drug-related employee misconduct and whether the
policies and procedures are followed; (3) the types of illegal
drug-related activities in which INS and Customs employees on the
Southwest Border have been involved; and (4) the extent to which lessons
learned from corruption cases closed in fiscal years 1992 through 1997
have led to changes in policies and procedures for preventing the
drug-related corruption of INS and Customs employees.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) both INS and Customs have policies and procedures
designed to ensure the integrity of their employees; (2) however,
neither agency is taking full advantage of its policies, procedures, and
the lessons to be learned from closed corruption cases to fully address
the increased threat of employee corruption on the Southwest Border; (3)
these policies and procedures consist mainly of mandatory background
investigations for new staff and 5-year reinvestigations of employees,
as well as basic integrity training; (4) while the agencies generally
completed background investigations for new hires by the end of their
first year on the job, as required, reinvestigations were typically
overdue, in some instances, by as many as 3 years; (5) both INS and
Customs said the basic training that new employees are to receive
includes integrity training; (6) agency records for 284 of 301 randomly
selected INS and Customs employees on the Southwest Border showed that
they received several hours of integrity training as part of their basic
training; (7) DOJ and Treasury have different organizational structures
but similar policies and procedures for handling allegations of
drug-related misconduct by INS and Customs employees; (8) DOJ&apos;s Office
of the Inspector General (OIG) is generally responsible for
investigating criminal allegations against INS employees; (9) GAO found
that the Justice OIG generally complies with its policies and
procedures; (10) at the Treasury, Customs&apos; Office of Internal Affairs is
generally responsible for investigating both criminal and noncriminal
allegations against Customs employees; (11) GAO could not assess
Customs&apos; compliance with its procedures because its automated case
management system and case files did not provide the necessary
information; (12) some INS and Customs employees on the Southwest Border
have engaged in a variety of illegal drug-related activities; (13) INS
and Customs have missed opportunities to learn lessons and change their
policies and procedures for preventing the drug-related corruption of
their employees; (14) the Justice OIG and Customs&apos; Internal Affairs
Office are required to formally report internal control weaknesses
identified from closed corruption cases, but have not done so; and (15)
GAO&apos;s review of 28 cases involving INS and Customs employees assigned to
the Southwest Border, who were convicted of drug-related crimes in
fiscal years 1992-1997, revealed internal control weaknesses that were
not formally reported or corrected.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-99-31/html/GAOREPORTS-GGD-99-31.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-99-31/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GGD-99-31.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/GGD-99-31</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-99-31</url>
</location>
<note>Chapter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/GGD-99-31; Drug Control: INS and Customs Can Do More To Prevent Drug-Related Employee Corruption;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Smuggling</topic>
 <topic>Drug trafficking</topic>
 <topic>Internal controls</topic>
 <topic>Federal employees</topic>
 <topic>Personnel management</topic>
 <topic>Customs administration</topic>
 <topic>Ethical conduct</topic>
 <topic>Bribery</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 503 (100th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 100-503</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>