<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180372f35">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999-09-07</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>24 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GGD-99-173</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-99-173</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180372f35</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg99173</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GGD-99-173</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GGD-99-173</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GGD-99-173</reportNumber>
 <subject>Federal employees</subject>
 <subject>Personnel management</subject>
 <subject>Human resources utilization</subject>
 <subject>Security clearances</subject>
 <subject>Interagency relations</subject>
 <subject>Personnel recruiting</subject>
 <subject>Internal controls</subject>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Background Investigations: Program Deficiencies May Lead</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on
background investigations conducted by the Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA), focusing on: (1) the circumstances that led DEA to
consider relinquishing its authority to conduct personnel background
investigations; and (2) whether the Office of Personnel Management (OPM)
acted in an independent and objective manner in choosing to review DEA
and its background investigations.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) a series of evaluations in the 1990s critical of
DEA&apos;s background investigations and personnel security program caused
DEA to consider relinquishing its background investigation authority;
(2) the findings of OPM&apos;s assessments over much of the 1990s, an
assessment by the Department of Justice (DOJ) in 1998, and its own
assessment in 1999 triggered DEA&apos;s consideration of this issue; (3)
DEA&apos;s relinquishment of investigation authority would be consequential
because DEA and its contractor performed an estimated 5,600 background
investigations in 1998; (4) during the late 1990s, OPM reviewed a sample
of 265 background investigation reports prepared by DEA and its
contractors and determined that all but 1 investigation was deficient in
meeting the investigative requirements that DEA had agreed to follow;
(5) DOJ audited DEA&apos;s personnel security program in 1997 and found
deficiencies similar to what OPM had found in 1992 and again in 1998;
(6) based on the DOJ audit and the recurring finds of OPM, DOJ&apos;s
Assistant Attorney General for Administration told the DEA Administrator
in October 1998 that he believed that DEA should relinquish all of its
background investigation authority to OPM; (7) in early 1999, DEA
conducted its own examination of the personnel security program,
focusing on background investigations, and concluded that DEA was not
able to capably perform or oversee background investigations; (8) this
lack of capability allowed security clearances to be granted, regardless
of whether the related background investigations were adequate; (9) DEA
had allowed contract investigators to perform background investigations,
even though the investigators had not gone through required background
investigations because DEA did not have funds to finance such
investigations; (10) as of July 1999, subsequent to its examination of
the personnel security program, DEA was considering relinquishing its
authority for background investigations to OPM, except for the authority
to investigate backgrounds of applicants for DEA Special Agent
positions; (11) DEA believed that it would be unwise to separate the
background investigation from the overall applicant selection process by
having them conducted by an independent entity not familiar with DEA&apos;s
unique requirements for Special Agents; and (12) OPM appeared to have
been objective and independent in choosing to review DEA&apos;s personnel
security program and background investigations.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-99-173/html/GAOREPORTS-GGD-99-173.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-99-173/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GGD-99-173.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/GGD-99-173</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-99-173</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/GGD-99-173; Background Investigations: Program Deficiencies May Lead;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Federal employees</topic>
 <topic>Personnel management</topic>
 <topic>Human resources utilization</topic>
 <topic>Security clearances</topic>
 <topic>Interagency relations</topic>
 <topic>Personnel recruiting</topic>
 <topic>Internal controls</topic>
</subject>
</mods>